Machine Learning Classifier Models Can Identify Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Phenotypes Using Readily Available Clinical Data
- PMID: 32551817
- PMCID: PMC7528785
- DOI: 10.1164/rccm.202002-0347OC
Machine Learning Classifier Models Can Identify Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Phenotypes Using Readily Available Clinical Data
Abstract
Rationale: Two distinct phenotypes of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) with differential clinical outcomes and responses to randomly assigned treatment have consistently been identified in randomized controlled trial cohorts using latent class analysis. Plasma biomarkers, key components in phenotype identification, currently lack point-of-care assays and represent a barrier to the clinical implementation of phenotypes.Objectives: The objective of this study was to develop models to classify ARDS phenotypes using readily available clinical data only.Methods: Three randomized controlled trial cohorts served as the training data set (ARMA [High vs. Low Vt], ALVEOLI [Assessment of Low Vt and Elevated End-Expiratory Pressure to Obviate Lung Injury], and FACTT [Fluids and Catheter Treatment Trial]; n = 2,022), and a fourth served as the validation data set (SAILS [Statins for Acutely Injured Lungs from Sepsis]; n = 745). A gradient-boosted machine algorithm was used to develop classifier models using 24 variables (demographics, vital signs, laboratory, and respiratory variables) at enrollment. In two secondary analyses, the ALVEOLI and FACTT cohorts each, individually, served as the validation data set, and the remaining combined cohorts formed the training data set for each analysis. Model performance was evaluated against the latent class analysis-derived phenotype.Measurements and Main Results: For the primary analysis, the model accurately classified the phenotypes in the validation cohort (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC], 0.95; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.94-0.96). Using a probability cutoff of 0.5 to assign class, inflammatory biomarkers (IL-6, IL-8, and sTNFR-1; P < 0.0001) and 90-day mortality (38% vs. 24%; P = 0.0002) were significantly higher in the hyperinflammatory phenotype as classified by the model. Model accuracy was similar when ALVEOLI (AUC, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.92-0.96) and FACTT (AUC, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.92-0.95) were used as the validation cohorts. Significant treatment interactions were observed with the clinical classifier model-assigned phenotypes in both ALVEOLI (P = 0.0113) and FACTT (P = 0.0072) cohorts.Conclusions: ARDS phenotypes can be accurately identified using machine learning models based on readily available clinical data and may enable rapid phenotype identification at the bedside.
Keywords: ARDS phenotypes; classifier models; machine learning.
Figures




Comment in
-
Machine Learning Classifier Models: The Future for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Phenotyping?Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 Oct 1;202(7):919-920. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202006-2388ED. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020. PMID: 32687397 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Development and validation of parsimonious algorithms to classify acute respiratory distress syndrome phenotypes: a secondary analysis of randomised controlled trials.Lancet Respir Med. 2020 Mar;8(3):247-257. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(19)30369-8. Epub 2020 Jan 13. Lancet Respir Med. 2020. PMID: 31948926 Free PMC article.
-
Validation and utility of ARDS subphenotypes identified by machine-learning models using clinical data: an observational, multicohort, retrospective analysis.Lancet Respir Med. 2022 Apr;10(4):367-377. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00461-6. Epub 2022 Jan 10. Lancet Respir Med. 2022. PMID: 35026177 Free PMC article.
-
Identifying molecular phenotypes in sepsis: an analysis of two prospective observational cohorts and secondary analysis of two randomised controlled trials.Lancet Respir Med. 2023 Nov;11(11):965-974. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(23)00237-0. Epub 2023 Aug 23. Lancet Respir Med. 2023. PMID: 37633303 Free PMC article.
-
Recent insight into potential acute respiratory distress syndrome.Saudi Med J. 2017 Apr;38(4):344-349. doi: 10.15537/smj.2017.4.15843. Saudi Med J. 2017. PMID: 28397939 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Predictive Modeling of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Using Machine Learning: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 13;27:e66615. doi: 10.2196/66615. J Med Internet Res. 2025. PMID: 40359510 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Digital health delivery in respiratory medicine: adjunct, replacement or cause for division?Eur Respir Rev. 2024 Sep 25;33(173):230251. doi: 10.1183/16000617.0251-2023. Print 2024 Jul. Eur Respir Rev. 2024. PMID: 39322260 Free PMC article. Review.
-
To Establish an Early Prediction Model for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Severe Acute Pancreatitis Using Machine Learning Algorithm.J Clin Med. 2023 Feb 21;12(5):1718. doi: 10.3390/jcm12051718. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 36902504 Free PMC article.
-
Identification of acute respiratory distress syndrome subphenotypes de novo using routine clinical data: a retrospective analysis of ARDS clinical trials.BMJ Open. 2022 Jan 6;12(1):e053297. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053297. BMJ Open. 2022. PMID: 34992112 Free PMC article.
-
ESICM guidelines on acute respiratory distress syndrome: definition, phenotyping and respiratory support strategies.Intensive Care Med. 2023 Jul;49(7):727-759. doi: 10.1007/s00134-023-07050-7. Epub 2023 Jun 16. Intensive Care Med. 2023. PMID: 37326646 Free PMC article.
-
Derivation of Coagulation Phenotypes and the Association with Prognosis in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Cluster Analysis of Nationwide Multicenter Study.Neurocrit Care. 2024 Feb;40(1):292-302. doi: 10.1007/s12028-023-01712-6. Epub 2023 Mar 28. Neurocrit Care. 2024. PMID: 36977962
References
-
- Bellani G, Laffey JG, Pham T, Fan E, Brochard L, Esteban A, et al. LUNG SAFE Investigators; ESICM Trials Group. Epidemiology, patterns of care, and mortality for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome in intensive care units in 50 countries. JAMA. 2016;315:788–800. - PubMed
-
- Kumar G, Kumar N, Taneja A, Kaleekal T, Tarima S, McGinley E, et al. Milwaukee Initiative in Critical Care Outcomes Research (MICCOR) Group of Investigators. Nationwide trends of severe sepsis in the 21st century (2000-2007) Chest. 2011;140:1223–1231. - PubMed
-
- Matthay MA, McAuley DF, Ware LB. Clinical trials in acute respiratory distress syndrome: challenges and opportunities. Lancet Respir Med. 2017;5:524–534. - PubMed
-
- Marshall JC. Why have clinical trials in sepsis failed? Trends Mol Med. 2014;20:195–203. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous