Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jun 17;17(1):96.
doi: 10.1186/s12978-020-00942-7.

Women's and girls' experiences of reproductive coercion and opportunities for intervention in family planning clinics in Nairobi, Kenya: a qualitative study

Sabrina C Boyce  1 , Jasmine Uysal  2 , Stephanie M DeLong  2 , Nicole Carter  2 , Chi-Chi Undie  3 , Wilson Liambila  3 , Seri Wendoh  4 , Jay G Silverman  2
Affiliations

Women's and girls' experiences of reproductive coercion and opportunities for intervention in family planning clinics in Nairobi, Kenya: a qualitative study

Sabrina C Boyce et al. Reprod Health. .

Abstract

Background: Reproductive coercion (RC), which includes contraceptive sabotage and pregnancy coercion, may help explain known associations between intimate partner violence (IPV) and poor reproductive health outcomes, such as unintended pregnancy. In Kenya, where 40% of ever-married women report IPV and 35% of ever-pregnant women report unintended pregnancy, these experiences are pervasive and co-occurring, yet little research exists on RC experiences among women and adolescent girls. This study seeks to qualitatively describe women's and girls' experiences of RC in Nairobi, Kenya and opportunities for clinical intervention.

Methods: Qualitative data were collected as part of the formative research for the adaptation of an evidence-based intervention to address reproductive coercion and IPV in clinical family planning counselling and provision in Nairobi, Kenya in April 2017. Focus group discussions (n = 4, 30 total participants) and in-depth interviews (n = 10) with family planning clients (ages 15-49) were conducted to identify specific forms of reproductive coercion, other partner-specific barriers to successful contraception use, and perceived opportunities for family planning providers to address RC among women and girls seeking family planning services. Additionally, data were collected via semi-structured interviews with family planning providers (n = 8) and clinic managers (n = 3) from family planning clinics. Data were coded according to structural and emergent themes, summarized, and illustrative quotes were identified to demonstrate sub-themes. Kenyan family planning providers and administrators informed interpretation.

Results: The results of this study identified specific forms of pregnancy coercion and contraceptive sabotage to be common, and often severe, impeding the use of contraceptives among female family planning clients. This study offers important examples of women's strategies for preventing pregnancy despite experiencing reproductive coercion, as well as opportunities for family planning providers to support clients experiencing reproductive coercion in clinical settings.

Conclusions: Reproductive coercion is a critical barrier to modern contraceptive use in Kenya. Results from this study highlight opportunities for family planning providers to play a critical role in supporting women and girls in their use of contraception when reproductive coercion is present.

Keywords: Family planning clinics; Intimate partner violence; Reproductive coercion; Reproductive health; Sub-Saharan Africa.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

    1. Smith SG, Zhang X, Basile KC, Merrick MT, Wang J, Kresnow M, et al. The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS): 2015 Data Brief – Updated Release. Georgia: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2018. [cited 2020 June 9]. 32 p. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/2015data-brief508.pdf.
    1. Silverman JG, Raj A. Intimate partner violence and reproductive coercion: global barriers to women's reproductive control. PLoS Med. 2014;11(9):e1001723. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ellsberg M, Jansen HA, Heise L, Watts PCH, Garcia-Moreno C. Intimate partner violence and women's physical and mental health in the WHO multi-country study on women's health and domestic violence: an observational study. Lancet. 2008;371(9619):1165–1172. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60522-X. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kenya National Bureau of Statistics (KNBS): Kenya demographic and health survey, 2014. Nairobi: Kenya National Bureau of Statistics and ICF International; 2015. [cited 2020 June 9]. Available from: https://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/fr308/fr308.pdf.
    1. Hindin MJ, Kishor S, Ansara DL. Intimate Partner Violence among Couples in 10 DHS Countries: Predictors and Health Outcomes. DHS Analytical Studies No. 18: Calverton: Macro International Inc; 2008.