Effectiveness of jejunostomy for enteral nutrition during complete thoracoscopic and laparoscopic Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy in thoracic segment esophageal carcinoma
- PMID: 32552786
- PMCID: PMC7298823
- DOI: 10.1186/s13019-020-01162-7
Effectiveness of jejunostomy for enteral nutrition during complete thoracoscopic and laparoscopic Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy in thoracic segment esophageal carcinoma
Abstract
Background: Although jejunostomy is widely used in complete thoracoscopic and laparoscopic minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy, its clinical effectiveness remains undefined. This study aimed to assess the therapeutic and side effects of jejunostomy in patients undergoing Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy for thoracic segment esophageal carcinoma.
Methods: A total of 1400 patients with esophageal carcinoma who underwent minimally invasive esophagectomy in the Thoracic Surgery of our hospital from 2015 to 2018 were retrospectively evaluated. Of these, 356 and 1044 were treated with nasojejunal feeding tubes (Nasojejunal group) and by jejunostomy (Jejunostomy group), respectively. Clinicopathologic factors, postoperative complications and tubule-related complications between the two groups were compared.
Results: Both groups were well-balanced for clinicopathological data, except tumor location, which was significantly different (P < 0.001). Operation time (208.8 ± 53.5 min vs. 218.1 ± 43.2 min) was shorter in the Jejunostomy group compared with the Nasojejunal group, while intraoperative (26.6 ± 10.4 min vs 18.4 ± 9.1 min) and postoperative (38.6 ± 6.9 min vs 18.5 ± 7.6 min) indwelling times of nutrition tubes were prolonged (all P < 0.05). Postoperative pulmonary infection (17.0% vs 22.2%), incision infection (0.2% vs 1.1%), nutrient tube slippage (0.2% vs 5.1%) and nutrient reflux 1 (0.1% vs 5.6%) rates were reduced in the Jejunostomy group compared with the Nasojejunal group (P < 0.05). Meanwhile, ileus rates perioperatively (1.7% vs 0.3%) and at 3 postoperative months (1.7% vs 0.3%) were both higher in the Jejunostomy group compared with the Nasojejunal group.
Conclusions: Jejunostomy is a reliable enteral nutrition method in Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy for thoracic segment esophageal carcinoma.
Keywords: Enteral nutrition; Esophageal neoplasm; Esophagectomy; Ivor-Lewis; Jejunostomy; McKowen; Nasointestinal tube.
Conflict of interest statement
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.
Figures
Similar articles
-
[Use of gastric tube in construction technique thoracoscopic and laparoscopic Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy].Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Aug 25;20(8):876-879. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2017. PMID: 28836245 Chinese.
-
[Short-term efficacy comparison between Ivor-Lewis approach and McKeown approach in minimally invasive esophagectomy].Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Sep;17(9):888-91. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2014. PMID: 25273657 Chinese.
-
[Efficacy comparison of Sweet versus Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy in the treatment of middle-lower esophageal squamous cell carcinoma].Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2016 Sep 25;19(9):979-984. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2016. PMID: 27680063 Chinese.
-
Is the routine placement of a feeding jejunostomy during esophagectomy worthwhile?-a systematic review and meta-analysis.Ann Palliat Med. 2021 Apr;10(4):4232-4241. doi: 10.21037/apm-20-2519. Epub 2021 Apr 15. Ann Palliat Med. 2021. PMID: 33894727
-
Laparoscopic T-tube feeding jejunostomy as an adjunct to staging laparoscopy for upper gastrointestinal malignancies: the technique and review of outcomes.BMC Surg. 2017 Mar 20;17(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12893-017-0221-2. BMC Surg. 2017. PMID: 28320382 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Robot-assisted Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy (RAILE): A review of surgical techniques and clinical outcomes.Front Surg. 2022 Nov 4;9:998282. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.998282. eCollection 2022. Front Surg. 2022. PMID: 36406371 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery of Great Britain and Ireland (AUGIS)/Perioperative Quality Initiative (POQI) consensus statement on intraoperative and postoperative interventions to reduce pulmonary complications after oesophagectomy.Br J Surg. 2022 Oct 14;109(11):1096-1106. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znac193. Br J Surg. 2022. PMID: 36001582 Free PMC article.
-
The Protective Mechanism of Afuresertib against Esophageal Cancer.Dis Markers. 2022 Jul 14;2022:1832241. doi: 10.1155/2022/1832241. eCollection 2022. Dis Markers. 2022. PMID: 35872696 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Tan LJ, Shen YX. Minimally invasive esophagectomy-technique and experience of Zhongshan hospital Fudan University. J Clin Surg. 2016;24(7):557–559.
-
- Yang Q, Wang YX, He M, Li J, Qi Z, Zhu SC, et al. Factors affecting on long-time survival in patients with stage III thoracic esophageal carcinoma after esophagectomy. Zhonghua zhong liu za zhi. 2016;38(7):530–537. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical