Potential risks in sentinel lymph node biopsy for cervical cancer: a single-institution pilot study
- PMID: 32552905
- PMCID: PMC7304089
- DOI: 10.1186/s12957-020-01905-9
Potential risks in sentinel lymph node biopsy for cervical cancer: a single-institution pilot study
Abstract
Background: Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is an attractive technique that is widely performed in many oncological surgeries. However, the potential risks in SLN biopsy for cervical cancer remains largely unclear.
Methods: Seventy-five patients with histologically confirmed cervical cancer were enrolled between May 2014 and June 2016. SLN biopsies were performed followed by pelvic lymphadenectomies and all resected nodes were labeled according to their anatomic areas. Only bilateral detections of SLNs were considered successful. Patients' clinicopathologic feature, performance of SLN detection, and distributions of lymph node metastases were analyzed.
Results: Of the 75 enrolled patients, at least one SLN was detected in 69 (92.0%), including 33 in bilateral and 36 in unilateral. SLNs were most detected in the obturator area (52 of 69 patients, 75.4%) and 26 (37.7%) patients presented SLNs in more than one area of hemipelvis. Lymphovascular invasion was found to be the only factor that adversely influenced SLN detection, while the tumor diameter, growth type, histological grade, deep stromal invasion, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy showed no significant impacts. Patients with lymphovascular invasion showed a significantly higher rate to have unsuccessful detection (90.9% versus 41.5%, P < 0.001) and lymph node metastasis (40.9% versus 3.8%, P < 0.001) compared with those without. Nodal metastases were confirmed in 11 patients, of whom 9 (81.8%) had lymphovascular invasion and 7 (63.6%) had non-SLN metastasis. The most frequently involved SLNs were obturator nodes (9/11, 81.8%). In addition, the parametrial nodes also have a high rate to be positive (4/11, 36.4%), although they were relatively less identified as SLNs. Besides, 3 patients showed metastases in the laterals without SLN detected.
Conclusions: In cervical cancer, lymphovascular invasion is a significant factor for unsuccessful SLN detection. The risk of having undetected metastasis is high when SLN is positive; therefore, further lymphadenectomy may be necessary for these patients.
Keywords: Cervical cancer; Lymphovascular invasion; Metastasis; Sentinel lymph node biopsy.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
Pathological factors associated with non-sentinel lymph node metastasis in early stage cervical cancer.J Surg Oncol. 2021 Mar;123(4):1115-1120. doi: 10.1002/jso.26341. Epub 2021 Feb 1. J Surg Oncol. 2021. PMID: 33524165
-
Role of one-step nucleic acid amplification (OSNA) to detect sentinel lymph node low-volume metastasis in early-stage cervical cancer.Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020 Mar;30(3):364-371. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2019-000939. Epub 2020 Jan 23. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020. PMID: 31980488
-
A prospective study evaluating an optimized sentinel node algorithm in early stage cervical cancer: The PROSACC-study.Gynecol Oncol. 2024 Aug;187:178-183. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.05.019. Epub 2024 May 23. Gynecol Oncol. 2024. PMID: 38788515
-
Lymphovascular invasion is a significant risk factor for non-sentinel nodal metastasis in breast cancer patients with sentinel lymph node (SLN)-positive breast cancer: a cross-sectional study.World J Surg Oncol. 2023 Dec 14;21(1):386. doi: 10.1186/s12957-023-03273-6. World J Surg Oncol. 2023. PMID: 38097994 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Controversies in Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Gynecologic Malignancies.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021 Mar;28(3):409-417. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.12.025. Epub 2020 Dec 24. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021. PMID: 33359741 Review.
Cited by
-
Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping: Current Applications and Future Perspectives in Gynecology Malignant Tumors.Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Jun 29;9:922585. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.922585. eCollection 2022. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022. PMID: 35847801 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with radical surgery for stage IB2/IIA2 cervical squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective, randomized controlled study of 35 patients.World J Surg Oncol. 2021 Jul 12;19(1):209. doi: 10.1186/s12957-021-02318-y. World J Surg Oncol. 2021. PMID: 34253208 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Endometrial cancer intraoperative sentinel lymph node identification can effectively guide treatment.Am J Transl Res. 2023 Oct 15;15(10):6115-6121. eCollection 2023. Am J Transl Res. 2023. PMID: 37969178 Free PMC article.
-
The distribution pattern of pelvic lymph nodal metastases in cervical cancer.J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023 Sep;149(12):9671-9677. doi: 10.1007/s00432-023-04810-2. Epub 2023 May 26. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023. PMID: 37237167 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Cabanas RM. An approach for the treatment of penile carcinoma. Cancer. 1977;39(2):456–466. - PubMed
-
- Lyman GH, Giuliano AE, Somerfield MR, Benson AB, 3rd, Bodurka DC, Burstein HJ, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology guideline recommendations for sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(30):7703–7720. - PubMed
-
- Cibula D, Abu-Rustum NR, Dusek L, Slama J, Zikán M, Zaal A, et al. Bilateral ultrastaging of sentinel lymph node in cervical cancer: lowering the false-negative rate and improving the detection of micrometastasis. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;127(3):462–466. - PubMed
-
- Altgassen C, Hertel H, Brandstädt A, Köhler C, Dürst M, Schneider A. Multicenter validation study of the sentinel lymph node concept in cervical cancer: AGO Study Group. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(18):2943–2951. - PubMed