Assessment of risk of intussusception after pilot rollout of rotavirus vaccine in the Indian public health system
- PMID: 32553493
- PMCID: PMC7347004
- DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.05.093
Assessment of risk of intussusception after pilot rollout of rotavirus vaccine in the Indian public health system
Abstract
Background: Pre-licensure trials of ROTAVAC® were not adequately powered to assess risk of intussusception, a rare adverse event associated with other rotavirus vaccines in some settings. We examined the risk of intussusception after ROTAVAC® vaccination among Indian infants during pilot rollout of the vaccine in the public health system in three states - Himachal Pradesh, Maharashtra and Tamil Nadu.
Methods: Passive surveillance for intussusception was set up in 35 sentinel health facilities covering 26.3 million population in the three states under monitoring of an Interministerial-Interagency Steering Committee. Clinical and immunization data were collected by independent teams. An expert committee blinded to vaccination status, classified intussusception cases using Brighton criteria. The self-controlled case-series method was used to estimate risk of intussusception (Brighton Level 1) after ROTAVAC® vaccination.
Results: 151 intussusception cases were included in the analysis. The relative incidence (incidence during the risk period compared to the control period) 1-21 days after doses 1 and 2 combined was 1.56 (95% CI, 0.0-5.28) and that for three doses combined was 1.88 (95% CI, 0.76-4.30). Attributable risk 1-21 days after doses 1 and 2 combined was 0.11 (95% CI, 0.0-0.25) and that for 3 doses combined was 0.42 (95% CI, 0.0-0.70) per 100,000 doses.
Conclusions: No increased risk of intussusception within 21 days of receipt of the first two doses combined or all 3 doses combined of ROTAVAC® was detected.
Keywords: Intussusception; Rotavirus vaccine; Vaccine safety.
Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Figures
References
-
- Patel M.M., Haber P., Baggs J., Zuber P., Bines J.E., Parashar U.D. Intussusception and rotavirus vaccination: a review of the available evidence. Expert Rev Vacc. 2009;8:1555–1564. - PubMed
-
- Ehresman K., Lynfield R., Danila R., Black S., Shinefield H., Fireman B. Intussusception among recipients of rotavirus vaccine–United States, 1998–1999. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1999;48:577–581. - PubMed
-
- Parashar U.D., Cortese M.M., Payne D.C., Lopman B., Yen C., Tate J.E. Value of post-licensure data on benefits and risks of vaccination to inform vaccine policy: the example of rotavirus vaccines. Am J Prev Med. 2015;49:S377–S382. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
