Efficacy of ipilimumab after anti-PD-1 therapy in sequential treatment of metastatic melanoma patients - Real world evidence
- PMID: 32554313
- DOI: 10.1016/j.advms.2020.05.005
Efficacy of ipilimumab after anti-PD-1 therapy in sequential treatment of metastatic melanoma patients - Real world evidence
Abstract
Purpose: Immunotherapy has become a standard treatment option for patients with metastatic melanoma, and the use of checkpoint inhibitors significantly improves the treatment outcomes in this group.
Patients and methods: A total of 116 patients with metastatic melanoma were enrolled in the study. In the first line, they were treated with an anti-PD-1 inhibitor (nivolumab or pembrolizumab), following which ipilimumab was used as the second-line therapy.
Results: BRAF mutation was detected in 12 patients (10%). The median progression-free survival (PFS) of ipilimumab treatment was 2.8 months, the overall survival (OS) was 5.1 months. The rate of 6-month survival was 45%, 1-year survival was 24%, and 2-year survival was 3%. The responses to treatment were: complete response in 2 cases (2%), partial response in 7 cases (6%), stable disease in 39 cases (34%). In multivariate analysis, normal levels of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) were associated with a longer median OS and PFS (p = 0.02 and p = 0.009, respectively), while 2 or less number of metastatic locations and the presence of BRAF mutations were correlated with a longer OS (p = 0.041 and p = 0.024, respectively).
Conclusions: Ipilimumab could be considered after anti-PD-1 treatment. Treatment with ipilimumab following anti-PD-1 therapy showed beneficial effects in patients with normal levels of LDH, 2 or less number of metastatic locations, and BRAF-mutated melanoma. However, further studies are required to confirm our results as the study included a low number of patients with BRAF mutation-positive melanoma. No significant increase in toxicity was detected with the use of ipilimumab after anti-PD-1 therapy.
Keywords: Anti-PD-1; Immunotherapy; Ipilimumab; Metastatic melanoma; Sequential treatment.
Copyright © 2020 Medical University of Bialystok. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest Grants and consultancies: Piotr Rutkowski – BMS, Novartis, Roche, Pierre Fabre and Merck; Jacek Mackiewicz - BMS, MSD, IL BMS, MSD, Roche. Fees and honoraria: Anna M. Czarnecka, Piotr Rutkowski, Paweł Rogala, Paweł Teterycz - Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, Roche, Merck; Bożena Cybulska-Stopa - BMS, Novartis, Roche, Pierre Fabre, MSD; Rafał Suwiński – BMS, MSD, Astellas Pharma; Jacek Mackiewicz – BMS, GlaxoSmithKline, Roche, MSD, Novartis, Pierre-Fabre, Łukasz Galus - BMS, Novartis, Roche, MSD, Marcin Rajczykowski - BMS, Novartis, Roche, Pierre Fabre, MSD, Iwona Ługowska - BMS, Novartis, Roche, MSD, Anna Dawidowska - BMS, Novartis, Roche, MSD.
Similar articles
-
Real-world efficacy and toxicity of combined nivolumab and ipilimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma.Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2019 Feb;15(1):26-30. doi: 10.1111/ajco.13100. Epub 2018 Nov 13. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2019. PMID: 30426665
-
The impact of BRAF mutation status on clinical outcomes with anti-PD-1 monotherapy versus combination ipilimumab/nivolumab in treatment-naïve advanced stage melanoma.Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2021 May;34(3):629-640. doi: 10.1111/pcmr.12944. Epub 2020 Nov 22. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2021. PMID: 33128316
-
Ipilimumab alone or ipilimumab plus anti-PD-1 therapy in patients with metastatic melanoma resistant to anti-PD-(L)1 monotherapy: a multicentre, retrospective, cohort study.Lancet Oncol. 2021 Jun;22(6):836-847. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00097-8. Epub 2021 May 11. Lancet Oncol. 2021. PMID: 33989557
-
Cost-effectiveness of nivolumab in advanced melanoma: a drug review.Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2021 Feb;21(1):13-28. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2021.1845144. Epub 2020 Dec 6. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2021. PMID: 33225752 Review.
-
Place des anti-PD1 dans la prise en charge des mélanomes cutanés.Bull Cancer. 2016 Jun;103(6 Suppl 1):S4-S11. doi: 10.1016/S0007-4551(16)30140-0. Bull Cancer. 2016. PMID: 27494973 Review. French.
Cited by
-
Systematic review and meta-analysis efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced melanoma patients with anti-PD-1 progression: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clin Transl Oncol. 2021 Sep;23(9):1885-1904. doi: 10.1007/s12094-021-02598-6. Epub 2021 Apr 20. Clin Transl Oncol. 2021. PMID: 33877531
-
Phytochemicals in Cancer Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy.Biomolecules. 2021 Jul 27;11(8):1107. doi: 10.3390/biom11081107. Biomolecules. 2021. PMID: 34439774 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Efficacy of immunotherapy beyond RECIST progression in advanced melanoma: a real-world evidence.Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2022 Aug;71(8):1949-1958. doi: 10.1007/s00262-021-03132-x. Epub 2022 Jan 25. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2022. PMID: 35075516 Free PMC article.
-
Personalized treatment concepts in extraocular cancer.Adv Ophthalmol Pract Res. 2024 Mar 1;4(2):69-77. doi: 10.1016/j.aopr.2024.02.003. eCollection 2024 May-Jun. Adv Ophthalmol Pract Res. 2024. PMID: 38590555 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Survival of Patients with Metastatic Melanoma Treated with Ipilimumab after PD-1 Inhibitors: A Single-Center Real-World Study.Cancers (Basel). 2024 Oct 4;16(19):3397. doi: 10.3390/cancers16193397. Cancers (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39410017 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous