Investigation of adverse reactions in healthcare personnel working in Level 3 barrier protection PPE to treat COVID-19
- PMID: 32554543
- PMCID: PMC7301344
- DOI: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2020-137854
Investigation of adverse reactions in healthcare personnel working in Level 3 barrier protection PPE to treat COVID-19
Abstract
Purpose of the study: The aim of our study was to investigate potential adverse reactions in healthcare professionals working in Level 3 barrier protection personal protective equipment (L3PPE) to treat patients with COVID-19.
Study design: By using a convenience sampling approach, 129 out of 205 randomly selected healthcare professionals from the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine were invited to take part in a WeChat messaging app survey, Questionnaire Star, via a survey link. Healthcare personnel details were collected, including profession, years of professional experience and adverse reactions while wearing L3PPE. Survey results were divided by profession and years of professional experience; differences in adverse reactions were compared.
Results: Among the 129 healthcare professionals surveyed, 21 (16.28%) were doctors and 108 (83.72%) were nurses. A total of 122 (94.57%) healthcare professionals experienced discomfort while wearing L3PPE to treat patients with COVID-19. The main reasons for adverse reactions and discomfort include varying degrees of adverse skin reactions, respiratory difficulties, heat stress, dizziness and nausea. Doctors had a lower incidence of rashes (χ2=4.519, p=0.034) and dizziness (χ2=4.123, p=0.042) when compared with nurses. Junior (8.5 years of experience or fewer) healthcare personnel also experienced a higher rate of heat stress when compared with senior personnel (more than 8.5 years greater) (χ2=5.228, p=0.022).
Conclusion: More attention should be offered to healthcare personnel wearing L3PPE to treat patients with COVID-19 because they are susceptible to developing adverse reactions.
Keywords: RESPIRATORY MEDICINE (see Thoracic Medicine).
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Similar articles
-
Skin problems related to personal protective equipment among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic (online research).Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2021 Sep;40(3):207-213. doi: 10.1080/15569527.2021.1902340. Epub 2021 Jul 5. Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2021. PMID: 34047217
-
Use of personal protective equipment against coronavirus disease 2019 by healthcare professionals in Wuhan, China: cross sectional study.BMJ. 2020 Jun 10;369:m2195. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m2195. BMJ. 2020. PMID: 32522737 Free PMC article.
-
Personal protective equipment and adverse dermatological reactions among healthcare workers: Survey observations from the COVID-19 pandemic.Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Mar 4;101(9):e29003. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029003. Medicine (Baltimore). 2022. PMID: 35244077 Free PMC article.
-
Personal protective equipment (PPE) and infection among healthcare workers - What is the evidence?Int J Clin Pract. 2020 Nov;74(11):e13617. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.13617. Epub 2020 Sep 9. Int J Clin Pract. 2020. PMID: 32734641 Review.
-
Desperate Times Call for Deliberate Measurement: A Review of COVID-19 Aerosol Barrier Devices and a Perspective from a Military Treatment Facility.Med J (Ft Sam Houst Tex). 2021 Jan-Mar;(PB 8-21-01/02/03):60-65. Med J (Ft Sam Houst Tex). 2021. PMID: 33666913 Review.
Cited by
-
The Association of the Prolonged Use of Personal Protective Equipment and Face Mask During COVID-19 Pandemic With Various Dermatologic Disease Manifestations: A Systematic Review.Cureus. 2021 Jul 21;13(7):e16544. doi: 10.7759/cureus.16544. eCollection 2021 Jul. Cureus. 2021. PMID: 34430151 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A Survey of Self-perceived Physical Discomforts and Health Behaviors Related to Personal Protective Equipment of Indian Dental Professionals during COVID-19 Pandemic.Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021 Nov-Dec;14(6):784-789. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2061. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021. PMID: 35110872 Free PMC article.
-
Resilience and Protection of Health Care and Research Laboratory Workers During the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic: Analysis and Case Study From an Austrian High Security Laboratory.Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 22;13:901244. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.901244. eCollection 2022. Front Psychol. 2022. PMID: 35936273 Free PMC article. Review.
-
COVID-19-specific adult basic life support guideline strategies for chiropractors and other healthcare providers to maximize the safety and efficacy of resuscitation: a commentary.Chiropr Man Therap. 2023 Jun 5;31(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12998-023-00488-y. Chiropr Man Therap. 2023. PMID: 37277875 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A Web Survey to Evaluate the Thermal Stress Associated with Personal Protective Equipment among Healthcare Workers during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Italy.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 7;18(8):3861. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18083861. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021. PMID: 33917051 Free PMC article.
References
-
- University JH . Coronavirus COVID-19 global cases by the center for systems science and engineering (CSSE) at Johns Hopkins University. 2020.
-
- Rodriguez-Morales AJ, Cardona-Ospina JA, Gutierrez-Ocampo E, et al. Clinical, laboratory and imaging features of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Travel Med Infect Dis 2020; 34: 101623. PubMed PMID: 32179124; eng.10.1016/j.tmaid.2020.101623 PubMed PMID: 32179124; eng. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- China NHCotPsRo . Technique standard for isolation in hospitals. Standard No.: WS_T_311_2009.
-
- Foo CC, Goon AT, Leow YH, et al. Adverse skin reactions to personal protective equipment against severe acute respiratory syndrome: a descriptive study in Singapore. Contact Dermatitis 2006;55:291–4. PubMed PMID: 17026695; eng10.1111/j.1600-0536.2006.00953.xPubMed PMID: 17026695; eng - DOI - PMC - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials