Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Jun 17;29(156):190120.
doi: 10.1183/16000617.0120-2019. Print 2020 Jun 30.

The radiological diagnosis of bronchiectasis: what's in a name?

Affiliations
Review

The radiological diagnosis of bronchiectasis: what's in a name?

Harm A W M Tiddens et al. Eur Respir Rev. .

Abstract

Diagnosis of bronchiectasis is usually made using chest computed tomography (CT) scan, the current gold standard method. A bronchiectatic airway can show abnormal widening and thickening of its airway wall. In addition, it can show an irregular wall and lack of tapering, and/or can be visible in the periphery of the lung. Its diagnosis is still largely expert based. More recently, it has become clear that airway dimensions on CT and therefore the diagnosis of bronchiectasis are highly dependent on lung volume. Hence, control of lung volume is required during CT acquisition to standardise the evaluation of airways. Automated image analysis systems are in development for the objective analysis of airway dimensions and for the diagnosis of bronchiectasis. To use these systems, clear and objective definitions for the diagnosis of bronchiectasis are needed. Furthermore, the use of these systems requires standardisation of CT protocols and of lung volume during chest CT acquisition. In addition, sex- and age-specific reference values are needed for image analysis outcome parameters. This review focusses on today's issues relating to the radiological diagnosis of bronchiectasis using state-of-the-art CT imaging techniques.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: H.A.W.M. Tiddens has received other funding from Roche and Novartis for symposium, lecture fees and advisory boards. He has received grants from CFF, Vertex, Gilead, Chiesi and Vectura outside the submitted work. He also has a patent pending for the PRAGMA-CF scoring system. He is head of the Erasmus MC core laboratory Lung Analysis which is a not-for-profit core image analysis laboratory. The financial aspects of the laboratory are handled by the department of Radiology and by the Sophia Research BV. FLUIDDA has developed computational fluid dynamic modelling based on chest CTs obtained from Erasmus MC-Sophia for which royalties are received by Sophia Research BV. Conflict of interest: J.J. Meerburg has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M.M. van der Eerden has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: P. Ciet has nothing to disclose.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
a) A healthy small airway and b) an inflamed airway with a thickened wall at full inspiration. On inspiration, the mucosa of the healthy airway is only slightly folded. The inflamed airway has larger folds compared with the normal airway. Mucus fills up the gaps between the mucosal folds. On chest CT, the folds and mucus will be interpreted as a thickened airway wall. This figure also illustrates why the outer diameter is a more robust parameter for diagnosing and quantifying bronchiectasis because in contrast to the inner diameter, it is not influenced by the presence of mucus in the lumen. Image provided by, and reproduced and modified with the kind permission of, M. Meerburg (Amsterdam, The Netherlands).
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
A spirometer-controlled chest computed tomography of a healthy adult showing the lung in the coronal plane at a) total lung capacity (TLC) and b) after full expiration at residual volume level. a) Arrows indicate the maximal height and width of the lung at TLC. b) The same dimensions projected over the lung in expiration. Note that the largest displacement is in the cranial caudal direction. Also note the differences in lung density and the altered orientation of the left and right main stem bronchi between inspiration and expiration. Finally, at full inspiration, the pleura parietalis is bulging out between the ribs, while on expiration the pleura parietalis is bulging in.

References

    1. Boaventura R, Shoemark A, Chalmers JD. Pathophysiology. In: Chalmers JD, Polverino E, Aliberti S, eds. Bronchiectasis (ERS Monograph). Sheffield, European Respiratory Society, 2018; pp. 8–28.
    1. Hansell DM, Bankier AA, MacMahon H, et al. . Fleischner Society: glossary of terms for thoracic imaging. Radiology 2008; 246: 697–722. doi:10.1148/radiol.2462070712 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Polverino E, Goeminne PC, McDonnell MJ, et al. . European Respiratory Society guidelines for the management of adult bronchiectasis. Eur Respir J 2017; 50: 1700629. doi:10.1183/13993003.00629-2017 - DOI - PubMed
    1. McDonnell MJ, Aliberti S, Goeminne PC, et al. . Comorbidities and the risk of mortality in patients with bronchiectasis: an international multicentre cohort study. Lancet Respir Med 2016; 4: 969–979. doi:10.1016/S2213-2600(16)30320-4 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chandrasekaran R, Mac Aogain M, Chalmers JD, et al. . Geographic variation in the aetiology, epidemiology and microbiology of bronchiectasis. BMC Pulm Med 2018; 18: 83. doi:10.1186/s12890-018-0638-0 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms