Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Jun 16;9(2):190-205.
doi: 10.1556/2006.2020.00024. Print 2020 Jun.

The Conceptual Framework of Harmful Gambling: A revised framework for understanding gambling harm

Affiliations
Review

The Conceptual Framework of Harmful Gambling: A revised framework for understanding gambling harm

Margo Hilbrecht et al. J Behav Addict. .

Abstract

Background and aims: The Conceptual Framework of Harmful Gambling moves beyond a symptoms-based view of harm and addresses a broad set of factors related to the risks and effects of gambling harmfully at the individual, family, and community levels. Coauthored by international research experts and informed by multiple stakeholders, Gambling Research Exchange (GREO) facilitated the framework development in 2013 and retains responsibility for regular updates and mobilization. This review article presents information about the revised version of the Conceptual Framework of Harmful Gambling completed in late 2018.

Methods: We describe eight interrelated factors depicted in the framework that represent major themes in gambling ranging from the specific (gambling environment, exposure, gambling types, and treatment resources) to the general (cultural, social, psychological, and biological influences). After outlining the framework development and collaborative process, we highlight new topics for the recent update that reflect changes in the gambling landscape and prominent discourses in the scientific community. Some of these topics include social and economic impacts of gambling, and a new model of understanding gambling related harm.

Discussion and conclusions: We address the relevance of the CFHG to the gambling and behavioral addictions research community. Harm-based frameworks have been undertaken in other areas of addiction that can both inform and be informed by a model dedicated to harmful gambling. Further, the framework brings a multi-disciplinary perspective to bear on antecedents and factors that co-occur with harmful gambling.

Keywords: conceptual framework; harmful gambling; harmful gambling antecedents; interdisciplinarity; public health; social determinants of health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Conceptual Framework of Harmful Gambling

References

    1. Abbott, M. (2006). Do EGMs and problem gambling go together like a horse and carriage? Gambling Research: Journal of the National Association for Gambling Studies (Australia), 18(1), 7.
    1. Abbott, M. (2007). Situational factors that affect gambling behavior. In Smith G., Hodgins D., & Williams R. (Eds.), Research and measurement issues in gambling studies (1st ed., pp. 251–278). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
    1. Abbott, M. (2017a). Beyond Reno: A critical commentary on Hancock and Smith. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 15(6), 1177–1186. 10.1007/s11469-017-9794-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Abbott, M. W. (2017b). Commentary on Currie et al. (2017): Low-risk gambling limits-a bridge too far? Addiction, 112(11), 2021–2022. 10.1111/add.14017. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Abbott, M., Bellringer, M., Garrett, N., & Kolandai-Matchett, K. (2017). Design and methods of the New Zealand national gambling study, a prospective cohort study of gambling and health: 2012–2019. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 15(6), 1242–1269. 10.1007/s11469-017-9843-y. - DOI