Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jun 18;5(12):e133668.
doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.133668.

The senescence-associated secretome as an indicator of age and medical risk

Affiliations

The senescence-associated secretome as an indicator of age and medical risk

Marissa J Schafer et al. JCI Insight. .

Abstract

Produced by senescent cells, the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) is a potential driver of age-related dysfunction. We tested whether circulating concentrations of SASP proteins reflect age and medical risk in humans. We first screened senescent endothelial cells, fibroblasts, preadipocytes, epithelial cells, and myoblasts to identify candidates for human profiling. We then tested associations between circulating SASP proteins and clinical data from individuals throughout the life span and older adults undergoing surgery for prevalent but distinct age-related diseases. A community-based sample of people aged 20-90 years (retrospective cross-sectional) was studied to test associations between circulating SASP factors and chronological age. A subset of this cohort aged 60-90 years and separate cohorts of older adults undergoing surgery for severe aortic stenosis (prospective longitudinal) or ovarian cancer (prospective case-control) were studied to assess relationships between circulating concentrations of SASP proteins and biological age (determined by the accumulation of age-related health deficits) and/or postsurgical outcomes. We showed that SASP proteins were positively associated with age, frailty, and adverse postsurgery outcomes. A panel of 7 SASP factors composed of growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15), TNF receptor superfamily member 6 (FAS), osteopontin (OPN), TNF receptor 1 (TNFR1), ACTIVIN A, chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 3 (CCL3), and IL-15 predicted adverse events markedly better than a single SASP protein or age. Our findings suggest that the circulating SASP may serve as a clinically useful candidate biomarker of age-related health and a powerful tool for interventional human studies.

Keywords: Aging; Cellular senescence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: YZ and NKL have a financial interest related to this research. Patents on senolytic drugs are held by the Mayo Clinic (US20170216286A1). This research has been approved by the Mayo Clinic Conflict of Interest Review Board and was conducted in compliance with Mayo Clinic conflict of interest policies.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Senescent human cells secrete a heterogeneous SASP.
(A) SA–β-Gal staining confirmed senescence induction in irradiated versus sham-treated human cells (scale bar: 200 μm). (B) Fold change in concentration of secreted SASP proteins by irradiated senescent cells (SnC) normalized to the sham control (C) samples for each cell type. (C) Absolute secreted protein concentration from 1 million senescent versus nonsenescent control cells. Abbreviations: endothelial cells (endo), preadipocytes (pre), fibroblasts (fibro), epithelial cells (epi), and myoblasts (myo). Mean is depicted; 2-tailed t tests with significance indicated as *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001; n = 3 replicates per cell type). See Supplemental Tables 1 and 2 for supportive data.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Circulating SASP factors are associated with chronological age.
Circulating concentrations of SASP proteins demonstrating the strongest unadjusted FDR-corrected Spearman’s correlations with chronological age are depicted among Mayo Clinic biobank participants age 20–90 years. Women (n = 137) are indicated by pink circles, and men (n = 130) are indicated by blue circles. See Supplemental Table 4 for supportive data.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Circulating SASP factors are associated with increased risk of adverse postoperative outcomes.
Levels of circulating SASP factors among older adults who underwent surgery for severe aortic stenosis and (A) experienced at least 1 adverse event (n = 42) or (B) were rehospitalized within 12 months of hospital discharge (n = 28) (black circles) were compared with counterparts who did not experience adverse outcomes (no adverse event, n = 55; no rehospitalization, n = 69) (gray circles). (C) Among older women who underwent surgery for ovarian cancer, circulating SASP factors were compared for participants who were admitted to the ICU within 30 days of surgery (n = 12) (black triangles) versus those who were not (n = 24) (gray triangles). (A–C: median ± 95% confidence interval are indicated with Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test results.) ROC AUCs indicating the adverse outcome risk discriminatory ability of a panel of 7 SASP factors (GDF15, FAS, OPN, TNFR1, ACTIVIN A, CCL3, and IL-15), a single top SASP factor (GDF15 or FAS), frailty score, or age plus sex for older adults undergoing surgery for (D and E) severe aortic stenosis or (F) age for older adults undergoing surgery for ovarian cancer. (G) All study participants in which accumulation of deficit frailty status was determined and all proteins were measured (n = 343) were clustered based on the presence of any postsurgical adverse event, frailty score, and chronological age. Six phenotypic clusters emerged: (1) nonfrail, younger, and no adverse events (n = 32); (2) nonfrail, older, and no adverse events (n = 25); (3) lower frailty score and no adverse events (n = 42); (4) intermediate frailty score and no adverse events (n = 82); (5) higher frailty score and adverse events (n = 53); (6) higher frailty score and no adverse events (n = 109). (H) Scaled concentration comparison of the 7 SASP proteins identified by GBM as associated with adverse events among the 6 clusters.

References

    1. Campisi J, Kapahi P, Lithgow GJ, Melov S, Newman JC, Verdin E. From discoveries in ageing research to therapeutics for healthy ageing. Nature. 2019;571(7764):183–192. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1365-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Muñoz-Espín D, Serrano M. Cellular senescence: from physiology to pathology. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2014;15(7):482–496. doi: 10.1038/nrm3823. - DOI - PubMed
    1. LeBrasseur NK, Tchkonia T, Kirkland JL. Cellular Senescence and the Biology of Aging, Disease, and Frailty. Nestle Nutr Inst Workshop Ser. 2015;83:11–18. doi: 10.1159/000382054. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. van Deursen JM. The role of senescent cells in ageing. Nature. 2014;509(7501):439–446. doi: 10.1038/nature13193. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dimri GP, et al. A biomarker that identifies senescent human cells in culture and in aging skin in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1995;92(20):9363–9367. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.20.9363. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types