Effectiveness and Safety of Reirradiation With Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy of Lung Cancer After a First Course of Thoracic Radiation: A Meta-analysis
- PMID: 32554982
- DOI: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000709
Effectiveness and Safety of Reirradiation With Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy of Lung Cancer After a First Course of Thoracic Radiation: A Meta-analysis
Abstract
Objective: The effectiveness and safety of reirradiation with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (re-SABR) in patients with recurrence after a previous course of radiation are limited to small series. We carried out a meta-analysis to summarize existing data and identify trends in overall survival (OS), local control (LC), and toxicity after re-SABR in patients with recurrence of lung cancer.
Materials and methods: Eligible studies were identified on Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and the proceedings of annual meetings through June 2019. We followed the PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines. A meta-regression analysis was carried out to assess whether there is a relationship between moderator variables and outcomes. A P-value<0.05 was considered significant.
Results: Twenty observational studies with a total of 595 patients treated were included. The 2-year OS and LC were 0.54 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.48-0.61) and 0.73 (95% CI: 0.66-0.80), respectively. The rate of any toxicity grade ≥3 was 0.098 (95% CI: 0.06-13.6), with 9 grade 5 toxicity (1.5%). In the meta-regression, the re-SABR dose (P=0.028), tumor size (P=0.031), and time to recurrence (P=0.018) showed an association with survival. For LC, the re-SABR dose (P=0.034) and tumor size (P=0.040) were statistically significant. Any toxicity grade ≥3 showed a relationship with the cumulative dose (P=0.024). Cumulative dose ≤145 versus >145 Gy2 had 3% versus 15% (P=0.013) of any grade ≥3 toxicity.
Conclusions: Re-SABR produces satisfactory LC and OS rates with an acceptable rate of toxicity. The balancing between the re-SABR dose and the tumor location has the potential to reduce severe and fatal toxicity.
Comment in
-
If at First You Don't Succeed-Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Recurrent Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2022 Sep 1;114(1):5-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.04.010. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2022. PMID: 35964631 No abstract available.
References
-
- Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:7–30.
-
- Amini A, Yeh N, Gaspar LE, et al. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for lung cancer patients previously treated with conventional radiotherapy: a review. Radiat Oncol. 2014;9:210.
-
- Noble J, Ellis PM, Mackay JA, et al. Second-line or subsequent systemic therapy for recurrent or progressive non–small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and practice guideline. J Thorac Oncol. 2006;1:1042–1058.
-
- Milano MT, Kong F-MS, Movsas B. Stereotactic body radiotherapy as salvage treatment for recurrence of non–small cell lung cancer after prior surgery or radiotherapy. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2019;8:78–87.
-
- Dickhoff C, Otten RHJ, Heymans MW, et al. Salvage surgery for recurrent or persistent tumour after radical (chemo)radiotherapy for locally advanced non–small cell lung cancer: a systematic review. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2018;10:1758835918804150.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
