Management of the bone loss by metaphyseal sleeves in primary and revision knee arthroplasty: clinical experience and outcome after forty three cases
- PMID: 32556384
- DOI: 10.1007/s00264-020-04663-1
Management of the bone loss by metaphyseal sleeves in primary and revision knee arthroplasty: clinical experience and outcome after forty three cases
Abstract
Aim of the study: Management of metaphyseal bone loss in complex primary and revision TKA is a challenge for surgeons. Out of various types of bony defects, large metaphyseal bone loss (AORI types IIB and III) requires special augments in the form of cones or sleeves. The aim of this study is to assess the reliability of metaphyseal sleeves, in dealing with massive bone defects to provide stability for immediate weight bearing and also to check short to mid-term survivorship of metaphyseal sleeves in Asian population by assessing various parameters and complications.
Methods: This is a retrospective study that includes 36 patients (43 knees), operated from 2011 to 2019. Patients with AORI type IIB (large metaphyseal bone defect) and AORI type III (metaphyseal defect with compromised collateral ligaments) were included. We included both the primary and revision knee arthroplasties in our study. Our interest in this study was to look for incidence of intra-operative iatrogenic fracture on the one hand, and post-operative complications in the form of peri-prosthetic joint infection and aseptic loosening on the other hand. Knee Society Score (KSS) was used to assess improvement in patient's clinical outcome. SPSS version 23 was used to process data.
Results: The average age of patients in our study was 59.4 (SD 9.78) years. Male to female ratio was 21:15. The average follow-up was 5.42 (SD 2.24) years with the longest follow up of nine years. Metaphyseal sleeves were used in 12 primary TKA and 31 revision TKA. During surgery, iatrogenic fracture of tibial condyle was encountered in three patients (6.9%), all were managed without any intervention and union was achieved in all cases. There was not a single case with aseptic loosening as per radiological criteria in our study. Peri-prosthetic joint infection (PJI) was encountered in a single case (2.3%). Pre-op Knee Society Score (KSS) was 36.21 (SD 7.43) where as it improved to 92.00 (SD 5.66), six months after surgery. Also the range of flexion was increased from 76.83o (SD 14.07o) to 122.91o (SD 4.84o).
Conclusion: In our study, metaphyseal sleeves showed excellent short to mid-term survivorship in AORI types IIB and III boneloss in Asian population. These results are comparable to various studies conducted on North American and European population. Metaphyseal sleeve is a reliable tool in the armamentarium of the arthroplasty surgeon. It is user friendly implant and provides immediate stability to allow full weight-bearing mobilization.
Keywords: AORI classification; Metaphyseal sleeves; Revision TKA; Total knee arthroplasty.
Similar articles
-
Metaphyseal Metal Sleeves for Reconstruction of Severe Knee Bone Defects: Excellent Survival Rate at a Mean Follow-Up of 6.4 Years.Orthop Surg. 2023 Dec;15(12):3202-3208. doi: 10.1111/os.13905. Epub 2023 Oct 24. Orthop Surg. 2023. PMID: 37873568 Free PMC article.
-
Revision total knee arthroplasty using metaphyseal sleeves at short-term follow-up.Orthopedics. 2014 Sep;37(9):e804-9. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20140825-57. Orthopedics. 2014. PMID: 25350623
-
Survivorship of Metaphyseal Cones and Sleeves in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.J Arthroplasty. 2022 Jun;37(6S):S263-S269. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.02.074. Epub 2022 Mar 5. J Arthroplasty. 2022. PMID: 35257822
-
Metaphyseal cones and sleeves in revision total knee arthroplasty: Two sides of the same coin? Complications, clinical and radiological results-a systematic review of the literature.Musculoskelet Surg. 2020 Apr;104(1):25-35. doi: 10.1007/s12306-019-00598-y. Epub 2019 Mar 16. Musculoskelet Surg. 2020. PMID: 30879231
-
Metaphyseal sleeves in total knee arthroplasty revision: complications, clinical and radiological results. A systematic review of the literature.Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2018 Jul;138(7):993-1001. doi: 10.1007/s00402-018-2967-0. Epub 2018 May 29. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2018. PMID: 29845317
Cited by
-
Metaphyseal Metal Sleeves for Reconstruction of Severe Knee Bone Defects: Excellent Survival Rate at a Mean Follow-Up of 6.4 Years.Orthop Surg. 2023 Dec;15(12):3202-3208. doi: 10.1111/os.13905. Epub 2023 Oct 24. Orthop Surg. 2023. PMID: 37873568 Free PMC article.
-
Bone defects in knee revision arthroplasty-a therapy-oriented classification.Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2025 Mar 29;145(1):217. doi: 10.1007/s00402-025-05759-2. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2025. PMID: 40156618 Free PMC article.
-
Does the use of 3D-printed cones give a chance to postpone the use of megaprostheses in patients with large bone defects in the knee joint?Open Med (Wars). 2022 Jul 15;17(1):1292-1298. doi: 10.1515/med-2022-0494. eCollection 2022. Open Med (Wars). 2022. PMID: 35903422 Free PMC article.
-
Bone resorption of vertebral bodies at the operative segment after prevail cervical interbody fusion: A case report.Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Sep 15;102(37):e35231. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000035231. Medicine (Baltimore). 2023. PMID: 37713843 Free PMC article.
-
Does stem profile have an impact on the failure patterns in revision total knee arthroplasty?Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Mar;143(3):1549-1569. doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04683-z. Epub 2022 Nov 30. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023. PMID: 36450936 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Kurtz SM, Lau E, Ong K, Zhao K, Kelly M, Bozic KJ (2009) Future young patient demand for primary and revision joint replacement: national projections from 2010 to 2030. Clin Orthop 467:2606–2612 - DOI
-
- Causero A, Di Benedetto P, Beltrame A, Gisonni R, Cainero V, Pagano M (2014) Design evolution in total knee replacement: which is the future? Acta Biomed 85(2):5–19 - PubMed
-
- Kurtz SM, Ong KL, Schmier J, Zhao K, Mowat F, Lau E (2009) Primary and revision arthroplasty surgery caseloads in the United States from 1990 to 2004. J Arthroplasty 24:195–203 - DOI
-
- Ponzio DY, Austin MS (2015) Metaphyseal bone loss in revision knee arthroplasty. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 8:361–367 - DOI
-
- Engh GA, Parks NL (1997) The management of bone defects in revision total knee arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect 46:227–236 - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous