Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2020 Aug;37(8):1949-1957.
doi: 10.1007/s10815-020-01857-9. Epub 2020 Jun 19.

Delayed versus immediate frozen embryo transfer after oocyte retrieval: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Jialyu Huang  1 , Jiaying Lin  1 , Xuefeng Lu  1 , Renfei Cai  1 , Ning Song  2 , Yanping Kuang  3
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Delayed versus immediate frozen embryo transfer after oocyte retrieval: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Jialyu Huang et al. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2020 Aug.

Abstract

Purpose: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare pregnancy outcomes between immediate frozen embryo transfer (FET) performed within the first menstrual cycle after oocyte retrieval and delayed FET following subsequent cycles.

Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science were searched for eligible studies through January 2020. The main outcome measures were clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), live birth rate (LBR), and pregnancy loss rate (PLR). The effect size was estimated as risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) using a random effects model. Inter-study heterogeneity was assessed by the I2 statistic.

Results: Twelve retrospective cohort studies involving 18,230 cycles were included. The pooled results revealed no significant differences between delayed and immediate FET in CPR (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.87-1.03; I2 = 67.9%), LBR (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.85-1.03; I2 = 67.5%), and PLR (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.87-1.26; I2 = 42.7%). Subgroup analyses of freeze-all cycles showed a marginal decrease of CPR in delayed FET (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.86-1.00; I2 = 53.6%), but no significant changes were observed regarding LBR (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.85-1.02; I2 = 65.2%) and PLR (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.84-1.41; I2 = 59.1%). No statistical differences were found in effect estimates among other subgroup analyses by ovarian stimulation protocol, trigger agent, endometrial preparation regimen, and embryo stage.

Conclusion: Timing of the first FET after oocyte retrieval was not significantly associated with pregnancy outcomes. This finding refutes the current common practice to delay FET after oocyte retrieval and reassures patients who wish to proceed with FET at their earliest convenience. Due to the high heterogeneity and observational nature of included studies, further randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm the results.

Keywords: Frozen embryo transfer; Meta-analysis; Oocyte retrieval; Pregnancy outcome.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The flow diagram of study selection. IVF, in vitro fertilization
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Forest plots of pregnancy outcomes for delayed versus immediate frozen embryo transfer after oocyte retrieval. a Clinical pregnancy rate. b Live birth rate. c Pregnancy loss rate. CI, confidence interval; FET, frozen embryo transfer
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Doody KJ. Cryopreservation and delayed embryo transfer-assisted reproductive technology registry and reporting implications. Fertil Steril. 2014;102(1):27–31. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.04.048. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Polyzos NP, Drakopoulos P, Parra J, et al. Cumulative live birth rates according to the number of oocytes retrieved after the first ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a multicenter multinational analysis including approximately 15,000 women. Fertil Steril. 2018;110(4):661–670.e661. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.04.039. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shapiro BS, Daneshmand ST, Garner FC, Aguirre M, Hudson C. Clinical rationale for cryopreservation of entire embryo cohorts in lieu of fresh transfer. Fertil Steril. 2014;102(1):3–9. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.04.018. - DOI - PubMed
    1. De Geyter C, Calhaz-Jorge C, Kupka MS, et al. ART in Europe, 2015: results generated from European registries by ESHRE. Hum Reprod Open. 2020;2020(1):hoz038. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoz038. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Blockeel C, Drakopoulos P, Santos-Ribeiro S, Polyzos NP, Tournaye H. A fresh look at the freeze-all protocol: a SWOT analysis. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(3):491–497. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev339. - DOI - PubMed