Analysis of performance factors in 240 consecutive cases of robot-assisted flexible ureteroscopic stone treatment
- PMID: 32557097
- DOI: 10.1007/s11701-020-01103-5
Analysis of performance factors in 240 consecutive cases of robot-assisted flexible ureteroscopic stone treatment
Abstract
Flexible ureteroscopy is the keystone of modern kidney stone treatment. Although a simple surgical technique achieves good clinical results and a low complication rate, there are high demands on the surgeon's dexterity and ergonomic restrictions. Robotic-assisted flexible ureteroscopy (rfURS) could overcome these limitations. After 4 years of use of rfURS at a tertiary stone center, performance factors were analyzed to define the role of rfURS in kidney stone management. A rfURS system was installed in August 2014 at the SLK Kliniken (Heilbronn, Germany). Treatment data of N = 240 consecutive patients undergoing rfURS were prospectively collected and analyzed. The patient cohort represents typical stone formers. N = 240 renal units containing 443 stones with an average stone load of 1798 mm3 were treated. Surgical parameters as well as the peri- and postoperative complications were recorded, analyzed and compared to the current data in the literature. OR time 91 min, stone treatment time 55 min, stone treatment efficacy 33 mm3/min; perioperative complications 5.4%; robot times: preparation 5 min, docking 5 min, console time to stone contact 6 min, console time 75 min; postoperative complications 6.7%; postoperative length of stay 1.5 days; stone-free rate (residuals < 2 mm) 90% and re-treatment rate 8.75%. This consecutive series represents real-life data about the utilization of rfURS. The detailed analysis of performance factors revealed the successful utilization of the first generation of robotic systems in endourologic stone surgery, and indicates that the robot performs comparably to conventional flexible URS. Optimal ergonomics maintain the surgeon's endurance in long-lasting surgeries.
Keywords: Learning curve; Robotic endourology; Robotic technology; Robotic ureteroscopy; Stone surgery; Ureteroscopy.
References
-
- Desai MM, Aron M, Gill IS et al (2008) Flexible robotic retrograde renoscopy: description of novel robotic device and preliminary laboratory experience. Urology 72(1):42–46 (Epub 2008/03/29) - DOI
-
- Desai MM, Grover R, Aron M et al (2011) Robotic flexible ureteroscopy for renal calculi: initial clinical experience. J Urol 186(2):563–568 (Epub 2011/06/21) - DOI
-
- Saglam R, Muslumanoglu AY, Tokatli Z et al (2014) A new robot for flexible ureteroscopy: development and early clinical results (IDEAL stage 1-2b). Eur Urol 66(6):1092–1100 (Epub 2014/07/26) - DOI
-
- Astroza G, Catalan M, Consigliere L, Selman T, Salvado J, Rubilar F (2017) Is a ureteral stent required after use of ureteral access sheath in presented patients who undergo flexible ureteroscopy? Cent Eur J Urol 70(1):88–92 (Epub 2017/05/04)
-
- Dindo D, Clavien PA (2008) What is a surgical complication? World J Surg 32(6):939–941 (Epub 2008/04/17) - DOI
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical