Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jun 16;17(12):4297.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph17124297.

Role of Area-Level Access to Primary Care on the Geographic Variation of Cardiometabolic Risk Factor Distribution: A Multilevel Analysis of the Adult Residents in the Illawarra-Shoalhaven Region of NSW, Australia

Renin Toms  1   2 , Xiaoqi Feng  2   3   4 , Darren J Mayne  1   2   5   6 , Andrew Bonney  1   2
Affiliations

Role of Area-Level Access to Primary Care on the Geographic Variation of Cardiometabolic Risk Factor Distribution: A Multilevel Analysis of the Adult Residents in the Illawarra-Shoalhaven Region of NSW, Australia

Renin Toms et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: Access to primary care is important for the identification, control and management of cardiometabolic risk factors (CMRFs). This study investigated whether differences in geographic access to primary care explained area-level variation in CMRFs.

Methods: Multilevel logistic regression models were used to derive the association between area-level access to primary care and seven discrete CMRFs after adjusting for individual and area-level co-variates. Two-step floating catchment area method was used to calculate the geographic access to primary care for the small areas within the study region.

Results: Geographic access to primary care was inversely associated with low high density lipoprotein (OR 0.94, CI 0.91-0.96) and obesity (OR 0.91, CI 0.88-0.93), after adjusting for age, sex and area-level disadvantage. The intra-cluster correlation coefficient (ICCs) of all the fully adjusted models ranged between 0.4-1.8%, indicating low general contextual effects of the areas on CMRF distribution. The area-level variation in CMRFs explained by primary care access was ≤10.5%.

Conclusion: The findings of the study support proportionate universal interventions for the prevention and control of CMRFs, rather than any area specific interventions based on their primary care access, as the contextual influence of areas on all the analysed CMRFs were found to be minimal. The findings also call for future research that includes other aspects of primary care access, such as road-network access, financial affordability and individual-level acceptance of the services in order to gain an overall picture of the area-level contributing role of primary care on CMRFs in the study region.

Keywords: cardiometabolic risk factor; geographic access; geographic variation; multilevel logistic regression; primary care access.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Map of the Illawarra-Shoalhaven region of NSW, Australia, showing SA1 areas and major landmarks.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Geographic access to primary care services in the Illawarra-Shoalhaven region of the NSW, Australia.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Alkerwi A., Bahi I.E., Stranges S., Beissel J., Delagardelle C., Noppe S., Kandala N.-B. Geographic variations in cardiometabolic risk factors in Luxembourg. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2017;14:648. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14060648. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Astell-Burt T., Feng X., Kolt G.S., McLean M., Maberly G. Understanding geographical inequities in diabetes: Multilevel evidence from 114,755 adults in Sydney, Australia. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2014;106:e68–e73. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2014.09.033. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barker L.E., Kirtland K.A., Gregg E.W., Geiss L.S., Thompson T.J. Geographic distribution of diagnosed diabetes in the US: A diabetes belt. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2011;40:434–439. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.12.019. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Congdon P. Estimating diabetes prevalence by small area in England. J. Public Health. 2006;28:71–81. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdi068. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lawlor D., Bedford C., Taylor M., Ebrahim S. Geographical variation in cardiovascular disease, risk factors, and their control in older women: British Women’s Heart and Health Study. J. Epidemiol. Community Health. 2003;57:134–140. doi: 10.1136/jech.57.2.134. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources