A survey about label enhancement methods for parenteral medication in European hospital pharmacies
- PMID: 32562003
- PMCID: PMC7560909
- DOI: 10.1007/s00228-020-02916-x
A survey about label enhancement methods for parenteral medication in European hospital pharmacies
Abstract
Purpose: Unclear labeling has been recognized as an important cause of look-alike medication errors. Little is known about which labeling practices are currently used in European hospitals. The aim of this article is to obtain an overview of the labeling practices for parenteral medications, in relation to national guidelines, in the Netherlands, Germany, and the UK.
Methods: An online survey was conducted using the Qualtrics® software. The survey was distributed to hospital pharmacists in the Netherlands, Germany, and the UK. The results were downloaded from Qualtrics and exported to Microsoft Excel. Data were categorized into groups and analyzed descriptively.
Results: In total, 104 responses were received. The response rate was 63% (n = 48) in the Netherlands and 11% (n = 41) for Germany; for the UK, 15 responses were received. In general almost 90% of the respondents followed the National guidelines concerning labeling of pharmacy-prepared parenteral products. The use of label enhancement techniques was relatively low in all countries. On average, the use of "Tall Man" lettering was 19%, the use of color coding was 29%, and the use of a barcode on the label was 27%.
Conclusion: Label-enhancement methods for parenteral medication in hospital pharmacies do not seem to be widely implemented and acknowledged in European hospitals, but response rates were limited for two countries. Greater standardization in conjunction with research for evidence-based enhancement techniques is needed to guide improvement in labeling practices across Europe.
Keywords: Hospital; Label enhancement; Look-alike; Parenteral medication.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Figures


Similar articles
-
A systematic literature review on strategies to avoid look-alike errors of labels.Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Aug;74(8):985-993. doi: 10.1007/s00228-018-2471-z. Epub 2018 May 12. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2018. PMID: 29754215 Free PMC article.
-
Development of a list of look-alike drug names with recommended tall man letters.Farm Hosp. 2011 Sep-Oct;35(5):225-35. doi: 10.1016/j.farma.2011.06.004. Epub 2011 Jul 31. Farm Hosp. 2011. PMID: 21807543 English, Spanish.
-
A comparison of the effects of different typographical methods on the recognizability of printed drug names.Drug Saf. 2014 May;37(5):351-9. doi: 10.1007/s40264-014-0156-9. Drug Saf. 2014. PMID: 24718712
-
Parenteral nutrition in hospital pharmacies.Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2016 Jul 11;29(6):664-74. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-08-2015-0104. Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2016. PMID: 27298063
-
EAHP European Statements Survey 2017, focusing on sections 2 (Selection, Procurement and Distribution), 5 (Patient Safety and Quality Assurance) and 6 (Education and Research).Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2018 Sep;25(5):237-244. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2018-001659. Epub 2018 Jul 31. Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2018. PMID: 31157033 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Horák P, Underhill J, Batista A, Amann S, Gibbons N. EAHP European Statements Survey 2017, focusing on sections 2 (Selection, Procurement and Distribution), 5 (Patient Safety and Quality Assurance) and 6 (Education and Research) Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2018;25(5):237–244. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2018-001659. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Thomas MR, Holquist C, Phillips J. Medication error reports to FDA show a mixed bag. FDA Saf Page. 2001;145(19):23–24.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources