Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2021 Mar;25(3):1019-1027.
doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03392-4. Epub 2020 Jun 19.

Healing of periodontal suprabony defects following treatment with open flap debridement with or without an enamel matrix derivative: A randomized controlled clinical study

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Healing of periodontal suprabony defects following treatment with open flap debridement with or without an enamel matrix derivative: A randomized controlled clinical study

Vincenzo Iorio-Siciliano et al. Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Mar.

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the healing of suprabony defects following treatment with either open flap debridement (OFD) and application of an enamel matrix derivative (EMD) with OFD alone.

Methods: Eighty patients with suprabony periodontal defects were randomly assigned to treatment with OFD + EMD (test) or OFD alone (control). The primary outcome variable was the difference in clinical attachment level (CAL) gain. At baseline and after 12 months, full-mouth plaque scores (FMPS), full-mouth bleeding scores (FMBS), probing depths (PD), gingival recessions (GR), and CAL were recorded.

Results: Sixty-five patients were available for the 12-month follow-up examination. At 12 months, the mean FMPS was 21.9 ± 3.0% in the OFD + EMD and 21.1 ± 2.4% in the OFD group, respectively (p = 0.30), while mean FMBS measured 20.4 ± 3.4% in the OFD + EMD group and 19.9 ± 2.9% in the OFD group (p = 0.48). Mean CAL gain at sites treated with OFD + EMD was statistically significantly different (p = 0.0001) compared with sites treated with OFD alone (3.4 ± 0.6 mm vs 1.8 ± 0.6 mm). A statistically significant difference (p = 0.0001) was found between mean PD change in the OFD + EMD (3.9 ± 0.6 mm) and OFD alone (3.2 ± 0.6 mm) treated groups and also in terms of mean GR change between treatment with OFD + EMD (0.5 ± 0.7 mm) and OFD alone (1.4 ± 1.0 mm) (p = 0.001).

Conclusion: Within their limits, the present results indicate that in suprabony periodontal defects, the application of EMD in conjunction with OFD may additionally improve the clinical outcomes compared with OFD alone.

Clinical relevance: In periodontal suprabony defects, the application of EMD in conjunction with OFD may additionally enhance the clinical outcomes in terms of CAL gain and PD reduction.

Keywords: Clinical trial; Enamel matrix derivative; Periodontal bone loss; Periodontitis; Suprabony defects; Surgical periodontal therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Papapanou PN (2000) Tonetti MS (2000) Diagnosis and epidemiology of periodontal osseous lesions. Periodontol 22:8–21. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0757.2000.2220102.x - DOI
    1. Stoecklin-Wasmer C, Rutjes AW, da Costa BR, Salvi GE, Jüni P, Sculean A (2013) Absorbable collagen membranes for periodontal regeneration: a systematic review. J Dent Res 9:773–778. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034513496428 - DOI
    1. Miron RJ, Sculean A, Cochran DL, Froum S, Zucchelli G, Nemcovsky C, Donos N, Lyngstadaas SP, Deschner J, Dard M, Stavropoulos A, Zhang Y, Trombelli L, Kasaj A, Shirakata Y, Cortellini P, Tonetti M, Rasperini G, Jepsen S, Bosshardt DD (2016) Twenty years of enamel matrix derivative: the past, the present and the future. J Clin Periodontol 43:668–668. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12546
    1. Nibali L, Koidou VP, Nieri M, Barbato L, Pagliaro U, Cairo F (2020) Regenerative surgery versus access flap for the treatment of intrabony periodontal defects. A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol (Epud ahead of print). https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13237
    1. Ferrarotti F, Giraudi M, Citterio F, Fratini A, Gualini G, Piccoli GM, Mariani GM, Romano F, Aimetti M (2020) Pocket elimination after osseous surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol (Epud ahead of print) 47:756–767. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13281 - DOI

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources