Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec;8(6):1375-1384.
doi: 10.1007/s43390-020-00161-x. Epub 2020 Jun 19.

Is rod diameter associated with the rate of rod fracture in patients treated with magnetically controlled growing rods?

Benjamin D Roye  1 , Gerard Marciano  1 , Hiroko Matsumoto  2 , Michael W Fields  1 , Megan Campbell  1 , Klane K White  3 , Jeffrey Sawyer  4 , John T Smith  5 , Scott Luhmann  6 , Peter Sturm  7 , Paul Sponseller  8 , Michael G Vitale  1 ; Growing Spine Study Group; Children’s Spine Study Group
Affiliations

Is rod diameter associated with the rate of rod fracture in patients treated with magnetically controlled growing rods?

Benjamin D Roye et al. Spine Deform. 2020 Dec.

Abstract

Introduction: Few risk factors for fracture in magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR) have been identified. We hypothesize an increased rate of rod fracture in small diameter rods compared to large diameter rods in patients with early-onset scoliosis (EOS). The purpose of this study was to determine the association between the diameter of MCGR constructs and the rate of rod fracture.

Methods: Patients with EOS who underwent MCGR implantation-primary or conversion-from 2013 to 2018 were identified from two registries including 40 centers. Rod diameter sizes greater than 5.0 mm or less than or equal to 5.0 mm were defined as "Large" and "Small" rods, respectively. Only dual-rod constructs were included. The primary outcome measure collected was rod fracture at any point in treatment up to the most recent follow-up. Cox regression was utilized for unequal follow-up to compare rate of breakage at the last follow-up between cohorts.

Results: 527 patients with 1,054 rods were included. 552 (52.4%) rods had a diameter of less than or equal to 5.0 mm and 461 (43.7%) rods had a diameter of greater than 5.0 mm. 41 (3.9%) rods were missing a recorded rod diameter and were not included in the analysis to determine the association between the rate of fracture and rod diameter. 20 (1.9%) total rod fractures occurred: 9 (1.6%) rods with diameters of ≤ 5.0 mm, 10 (2.2%) rods with diameters of > 5.0 mm, and 1 uncategorized rod (p = 0.529). No difference in the rate of rod fracture or survival distribution was found between rod diameters of > 5.0 mm and ≤ 5.0 mm even after stratification by ambulatory status, major coronal curve, weight, or location of anchors.

Discussion: Rod fracture appears to be a rare event in dual MCGR constructs and rod diameter does not seem to be associated with the incidence or rate of rod fracture. Surgeons may consider other criteria for selecting rod diameter in their patients such as patient size, amount of surgical correction, single vs. dual constructs, and risk of hardware prominence.

Keywords: Early onset scoliosis; MCGR; Rod fracture.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Klyce W, Mitchell S, Pawelek J, Skaggs D, Sanders J, Shah S, McCarthy R, Luhman S, Sturm P, Akbarnia B, Sponseller P (2018) Current use in growth-friendly implants: a ten-year update. Spine Deform 6:797–798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2018.09.015 - DOI
    1. Akbarnia BA, Breakwell LM, Marks DS, McCarthy RE, Thompson AG, Canale SK, Kostial PN, Tambe A, Asher MA, Growing Spine Study Group (2008) Dual growing rod technique followed for three to eleven years until final fusion: the effect of frequency of lengthening. Spine (Phila. Pa. 1976) 33: 984–90 (OD-2008/04/23). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?Db=pubmed&DbFrom=pubmed&am...
    1. Akbarnia BA, Marks DS, Boachie-Adjei O, Thompson AG, Asher MA (2005) Dual growing rod technique for the treatment of progressive early-onset scoliosis: a multicenter study. Spine (Phila. Pa. 1976) 30:S46–57. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16138066 . Accessed 9 Jul 2014
    1. Hasler C-C, Mehrkens A, Hefti F (2010) Efficacy and safety of VEPTR instrumentation for progressive spine deformities in young children without rib fusions. Eur Spine J 19:400–408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-009-1253-9 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sankar WN, Acevedo DC, Skaggs DL (2010) Comparison of complications among growing spinal implants. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35:2091–2096. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181c6edd7 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources