Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Oct;24(10):1043-1046.
doi: 10.1007/s10151-020-02254-1. Epub 2020 Jun 19.

Loss of seton in patients with complex anal fistula: a retrospective comparison of conventional knotted loose seton and knot-free seton

C Verkade  1 , D D E Zimmerman  1 , D K Wasowicz  1 , S W Polle  2 , H S de Vries  3   4
Affiliations

Loss of seton in patients with complex anal fistula: a retrospective comparison of conventional knotted loose seton and knot-free seton

C Verkade et al. Tech Coloproctol. 2020 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Loose setons are often utilized. Replacements after seton loss are frequent, but the exact incidence of this loss of seton (LOS) in patients is unknown. The aim of the present study was to assess the incidence of LOS in a population with complex anal fistula, comparing the knot-free loose seton with the conventional knotted loose seton.

Methods: All consecutive patients treated with a loose seton for complex anal fistula in two large teaching hospitals in the Netherlands between January 2017 and December 2019 were included in the present study. The incidence of loss of a conventional knotted loose seton was compared with the loss of commercially available knot-free setons.

Results: There were 212 patients. Fifty-two patients were included in the knotted loose group and 160 patients were included in the knot-free seton group. Sixteen patients who were treated with both a knotted and a knot-free loose seton were included in both groups. The incidence of LOS was 12% in the knotted seton group and 28% in the knot-free loose seton group (p = 0.02). Median time to LOS was 36 days for the knotted loose seton and 89 days for the knot-free loose seton (p = 0.36). Sex (p = 0.61), age at the time of seton placement (p = 0.60), and presence of inflammatory bowel disease (p = 0.28) were not significantly associated with LOS.

Conclusions: LOS occurs frequently in patients treated for complex anal fistulas. The incidence of LOS is significantly higher in patients treated with a knot-free loose seton. Further developments in seton manufacturing should be focussed on optimisation of the closure mechanism.

Keywords: Complex perianal fistulas; Knot-free seton; Loose seton; Rectal fistula.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Ertem M, Gok H, Ozveri E, Ozben V (2014) Application of advancement flap after loose seton placement: a modified two-stage surgical repair of a transsphincteric anal fistula. Ann Coloproctol 30:192. https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2014.30.4.192 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Takesue Y, Ohge H, Yokoyama T, Murakami Y, Imamura Y, Sueda T (2002) Long-term results of seton drainage on complex anal fistulae in patients with Crohn's disease. J Gastroenterol 37:912–915. https://doi.org/10.1007/s005350200153 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Galis-Rozen E, Tulchinsky H, Rosen A et al (2010) Long-term outcome of loose seton for complex anal fistula: a two-centre study of patients with and without Crohn’s disease. Colorectal Dis 12:358–362. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.01796.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Subhas G, Singh Bhullar J, Al-Omari A, Unawane A, Mittal VK, Pearlman R (2012) Setons in the treatment of anal fistula: review of variations in materials and techniques. Dig Surg 29:292–300. https://doi.org/10.1159/000342398 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kristo I, Stift A, Staud C et al (2016) The type of loose seton for complex anal fistula is essential to improve perianal comfort and quality of life. Colorectal Dis 18:194–198. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.13335 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources