Lixisenatide for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients Inadequately Controlled on Oral Antidiabetic Drugs: A Mixed-Treatment Comparison Meta-analysis and Cost-Utility Analysis
- PMID: 32562244
- PMCID: PMC7376816
- DOI: 10.1007/s13300-020-00857-3
Lixisenatide for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients Inadequately Controlled on Oral Antidiabetic Drugs: A Mixed-Treatment Comparison Meta-analysis and Cost-Utility Analysis
Abstract
Introduction: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy, safety and cost-utility (from the Chinese health insurance perspective) of lixisenatide and insulin regimens in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) inadequately controlled on oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs).
Methods: A comprehensive literature search of English (PubMed and Cochrane Library) and Chinese (CNKI and WanFang) language databases was performed, and head-to-head relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were retrieved and analyzed by performing a mixed-treatment comparison (MTC) meta-analysis for efficacy and safety endpoints. A cost-utility analysis was then conducted using the IQVIA CORE Diabetes Model to compare the lifetime pharmacoeconomic profiles among the treatment groups.
Results: Eleven RCTs were included in this MTC meta-analysis. Regarding glycated hemoglobin targets, lixisenatide was similar to both basal insulin (mean difference [MD] 0.27%; 95% credible interval [CrI] 0.02%, 0.57%) and premixed insulin (MD 0.32%; 95% CrI - 0.01%, 0.66%), respectively. Statistically significant differences were found for changes in body weight in favor of lixisenatide compared with basal insulin (MD - 3.22 kg; 95% CrI - 5.51 kg, - 0.94 kg) and premixed insulin (MD - 2.68 kg; 95% CrI - 5.16 kg, - 0.20 kg). The relative risk (RR) of symptomatic hypoglycemia associated with lixisenatide was also significantly lower than that associated with basal insulin (RR 0.22; 95% CrI 0.09, 0.52) and premixed insulin (RR 0.17; 95% CrI 0.07, 0.41). The cost-utility analysis yielded results of ¥61,072 ($8565, vs. basal insulin) and ¥127,169 ($17,836, vs. premixed insulin) per quality-adjusted life year gained, with both values falling within the willingness-to-pay threshold in China.
Conclusions: For T2DM patients inadequately controlled on OADs, lixisenatide was shown to be comparable to basal insulin and premixed insulin in terms of HbA1c and better than both of the latter in terms of both body weight loss and hypoglycemia. Lixisenatide was also a cost-effective treatment option from the perspective of Chinese health insurance.
Keywords: Chinese; Economics; GLP-1 analogue; Network meta-analysis; Type 2 diabetes.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Comparison of lixisenatide in combination with basal insulin vs other insulin regimens for the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled by basal insulin: Systematic review, network meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis.Diabetes Obes Metab. 2020 Jan;22(1):107-115. doi: 10.1111/dom.13871. Epub 2019 Oct 7. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2020. PMID: 31469217
-
Indirect comparison of lixisenatide versus neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin as add-on to metformin and sulphonylurea in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.Ger Med Sci. 2014 Oct 16;12:Doc14. doi: 10.3205/000199. eCollection 2014. Ger Med Sci. 2014. PMID: 25332702 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Lixisenatide treatment for older patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus uncontrolled on oral antidiabetics: meta-analysis of five randomized controlled trials.Adv Ther. 2014 Aug;31(8):861-72. doi: 10.1007/s12325-014-0146-4. Epub 2014 Aug 21. Adv Ther. 2014. PMID: 25143188
-
Lixisenatide versus insulin glulisine on top of insulin glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a cost-per-responder analysis in China.Curr Med Res Opin. 2020 Feb;36(2):213-217. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2019.1662676. Epub 2019 Sep 11. Curr Med Res Opin. 2020. PMID: 31469303
-
Efficacy and safety of insulin glargine/lixisenatide fixed-ratio combination (iGlarLixi) in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled on basal insulin and oral antidiabetic drugs: The LixiLan JP-L randomized clinical trial.Diabetes Obes Metab. 2020 Sep;22 Suppl 4:3-13. doi: 10.1111/dom.14005. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2020. PMID: 32072742 Clinical Trial.
Cited by
-
Adverse drug events in cost-effectiveness models of pharmacological interventions for diabetes, diabetic retinopathy, and diabetic macular edema: a scoping review.JBI Evid Synth. 2024 Nov 1;22(11):2194-2266. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-23-00511. JBI Evid Synth. 2024. PMID: 39054883 Free PMC article.
-
Cost-effectiveness of GLP-1 receptor agonists versus insulin for the treatment of type 2 diabetes: a real-world study and systematic review.Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2021 Jan 19;20(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12933-020-01211-4. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2021. PMID: 33468131 Free PMC article.
-
Pharmacoeconomic Aspects of Diabetes Mellitus: Outcomes and Analysis of Health Benefits Approach.Curr Diabetes Rev. 2024;20(8):12-22. doi: 10.2174/0115733998246567230924134603. Curr Diabetes Rev. 2024. PMID: 37842896 Review.
-
A systematic review on reporting quality of economic evaluations for negotiated glucose-lowering drugs in China national reimbursement drug list.BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 May 1;24(1):562. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11001-3. BMC Health Serv Res. 2024. PMID: 38693514 Free PMC article.
-
The Multifunctional Role of Herbal Products in the Management of Diabetes and Obesity: A Comprehensive Review.Molecules. 2022 Mar 6;27(5):1713. doi: 10.3390/molecules27051713. Molecules. 2022. PMID: 35268815 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- International Diabetes Federation . IDF diabetes atlas. 8. Brussels: International Diabetes Federation; 2017. - PubMed
-
- Pan CY, Han P, Liu X, et al. Lixisenatide treatment improves glycaemic control in Asian patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled on metformin with or without sulfonylurea: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 24-week trial (GetGoal-M-Asia) Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2014;30(8):726–735. - PubMed
-
- Tong PC, Ko GT, So W-Y, et al. Use of anti-diabetic drugs and glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes—the Hong Kong Diabetes Registry. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2008;82(3):346–352. - PubMed
-
- Diabetes Society of Chinese Medical Association Guidelines for the prevention and treatment of type 2 diabetes in China (2017 edition) Chin J Diabetes. 2018;10(1):4–67.
-
- Nauck MA, Meier JJ. The incretin effect in healthy individuals and those with type 2 diabetes: physiology, pathophysiology, and response to therapeutic interventions. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016;4(6):525–536. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources