Optimally estimating the sample standard deviation from the five-number summary
- PMID: 32562361
- DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1429
Optimally estimating the sample standard deviation from the five-number summary
Abstract
When reporting the results of clinical studies, some researchers may choose the five-number summary (including the sample median, the first and third quartiles, and the minimum and maximum values) rather than the sample mean and standard deviation (SD), particularly for skewed data. For these studies, when included in a meta-analysis, it is often desired to convert the five-number summary back to the sample mean and SD. For this purpose, several methods have been proposed in the recent literature and they are increasingly used nowadays. In this article, we propose to further advance the literature by developing a smoothly weighted estimator for the sample SD that fully utilizes the sample size information. For ease of implementation, we also derive an approximation formula for the optimal weight, as well as a shortcut formula for the sample SD. Numerical results show that our new estimator provides a more accurate estimate for normal data and also performs favorably for non-normal data. Together with the optimal sample mean estimator in Luo et al., our new methods have dramatically improved the existing methods for data transformation, and they are capable to serve as "rules of thumb" in meta-analysis for studies reported with the five-number summary. Finally for practical use, an Excel spreadsheet and an online calculator are also provided for implementing our optimal estimators.
Keywords: SD; five-number summary; interquartile range; range; sample mean; sample size.
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Guyatt G, Cairns J, Churchill D, et al. Evidence-based medicine: a new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. Jama. 1992;268:2420-2425.
-
- Lau J, Ioannidis JP, Schmid CH. Quantitative synthesis in systematic reviews. Ann Intern Med. 1997;127(9):820-826.
-
- Guyatt G, Rennie D, Meade M, et al. Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: A Manual for Evidence-Based Clinical Practice. 3rd ed. Chicago, IL: AMA Press; 2002.
-
- Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JP, et al. Introduction to Meta-Analysis. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons; 2009.
-
- Higgins JP, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Chichester, OH: John Wiley and Sons; 2008.
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical