Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2020 Nov-Dec;8(10):3434-3442.e4.
doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.06.009. Epub 2020 Jun 18.

Efficacy of Reslizumab Treatment in Exacerbation-Prone Patients with Severe Eosinophilic Asthma

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Efficacy of Reslizumab Treatment in Exacerbation-Prone Patients with Severe Eosinophilic Asthma

Michael E Wechsler et al. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020 Nov-Dec.

Abstract

Background: Patients with severe eosinophilic asthma have increased risk of clinical asthma exacerbations (CAEs), impaired lung function, and lower quality of life (QoL) compared with patients with noneosinophilic asthma. The efficacy and safety of intravenous reslizumab have been demonstrated in 2 duplicate, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 studies.

Objective: We present findings from post hoc analyses of the subgroup of patients from the phase 3 studies with severe (Global Initiative for Asthma [GINA] Step 4 or 5) eosinophilic asthma who had ≥2 or ≥3 CAEs in the 12 months before screening.

Methods: Patients aged ≥12 years with severe eosinophilic asthma were randomized (1:1) to reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg or placebo every 4 weeks for 1 year. Outcomes assessed included CAEs, forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), and Asthma Control Questionnaire 6 (ACQ-6) and Asthma QoL Questionnaire (AQLQ) scores.

Results: Of 953 patients randomized, 318 (reslizumab: n = 156; placebo: n = 162) and 164 (reslizumab: n = 72; placebo: n = 92) were GINA 4/5 with ≥2 CAEs in the prior year and ≥3 CAEs in the prior year, respectively. Reslizumab significantly improved CAE rate, time to first CAE, and the proportion of patients who experienced ≥1 CAE versus placebo in both CAE subgroups. Improvements in FEV1, ACQ-6 and AQLQ scores, and systemic corticosteroid burden were also observed with reslizumab versus placebo after 52 weeks of treatment in both CAE subgroups.

Conclusion: Reslizumab reduced CAE frequency and improved lung function, asthma control, and QoL versus placebo in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma with a high CAE rate before treatment.

Keywords: Asthma exacerbation; Eosinophilic asthma; GINA 4/5; Interleukin-5; Reslizumab; Severe asthma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

  • Anti-IL-5 therapies for asthma.
    Farne HA, Wilson A, Milan S, Banchoff E, Yang F, Powell CV. Farne HA, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 12;7(7):CD010834. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010834.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 35838542 Free PMC article.
  • Diagnosis and management of asthma in children.
    Martin J, Townshend J, Brodlie M. Martin J, et al. BMJ Paediatr Open. 2022 Apr;6(1):e001277. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2021-001277. BMJ Paediatr Open. 2022. PMID: 35648804 Free PMC article. Review.

Publication types