Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2020:72:346-350.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2020.05.087. Epub 2020 Jun 12.

Amputation in crush syndrome: A case report

María Camila Arango-Granados  1 , Diego Fernando Cruz Mendoza  2 , Alexander Ernesto Salcedo Cadavid  3 , Alberto Federico García Marín  4
Affiliations
Case Reports

Amputation in crush syndrome: A case report

María Camila Arango-Granados et al. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2020.

Abstract

Introduction: Crush syndrome (CS) is a condition with a high morbidity and mortality due to severe electrolyte disorders, circulatory dysfunction and multiple organ failure, secondary to severe rhabdomyolysis and reperfusion injuries. There is controversy about the role of fasciotomy in the treatment of compartment syndromes due to crush injuries and it is still unknown if early amputation has patient-centered benefits.

Case presentation: This is a 29-year-old patient whose lower body was trapped for 50 h under a 40-meter landslide. Upon admission the left thigh was edematous and painful. Laboratories revealed a creatinine of 1.58 mg/dL, hyperkalemia, metabolic acidosis, hyperlactatemia and creatinine phosphokinase (CPK) of 88,700 U/L, suggesting CS. Despite fluid and bicarbonate infusion his renal function worsened, CPK rose and left thigh became more tense, so a fasciotomy was performed. He developed a distributive shock refractory to vasopressors, steroids and methylene blue so amputation was proposed. Two hours after amputation the vasopressor support was nearly withdrawn.

Discussion: This case suggests a potential benefit of amputation in patients with CS and progressive deterioration despite aggressive resuscitation. It also invites to think if this is a decision that should be considered before the establishment or in the initial stages of the syndrome, even if the viability of the extremity is still questionable.

Conclusion: The presence of risk factors for poor prognosis can favor amputation despite the apparent viability of the limb and the morbidity of losing an extremity.

Keywords: Amputation; Crush injuries; Crush syndrome; Fasciotomy; Rhabdomyolysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Lower extremities of a patient victim of a crush injury. The left thigh is edematous, with an increased perimeter with respect to the contralateral.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Hemodynamic support following fasciotomy.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Hemodynamic support following amputation.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Jagodzinski N.A., Weerasinghe C., Porter K. Crush injuries and crush syndrome – a review. Part 1: the systemic injury. Trauma. 2010;12:69–88.
    1. Oda J., Tanaka H., Yoshioka T., Iwai A., Yamamura H., Ishikawa K. Analysis of 372 patients with Crush syndrome caused by the Hanshin-Awaji earthquake. J. Trauma. 1997;42(3):470–475. discussion 5-6. - PubMed
    1. Sever M.S., Erek E., Vanholder R., Akoglu E., Yavuz M., Ergin H. Clinical findings in the renal victims of a catastrophic disaster: the Marmara earthquake. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2002;17(11):1942–1949. - PubMed
    1. Peek-Asa C., Kraus J.F., Bourque L.B., Vimalachandra D., Yu J., Abrams J. Fatal and hospitalized injuries resulting from the 1994 Northridge earthquake. Int. J. Epidemiol. 1998;27(3):459–465. - PubMed
    1. Agha R.A., Borrelli M.R., Farwana R., Koshy K., Fowler A.J., Orgill D.P. The SCARE 2018 statement: updating consensus surgical CAse REport (SCARE) guidelines. Int. J. Surg. 2018;60:132–136. - PubMed

Publication types