Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Jul;90(7-8):1277-1282.
doi: 10.1111/ans.16084. Epub 2020 Jun 21.

Design and establishment of a cancer registry: a literature review

Jamie S Wormald  1 , Tarandeep Oberai  2 , Harriet Branford-White  2 , Luke J Johnson  2
Affiliations
Review

Design and establishment of a cancer registry: a literature review

Jamie S Wormald et al. ANZ J Surg. 2020 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Establishment of a cancer registry is a complex process that requires substantial resources and careful planning. There are numerous resources available to provide guidance for this, which include guidelines and frameworks of varying quality. It is the authors' goal to identify evidence-based recommendations within the literature to help guide the process of designing a new registry with optimal efficiency, workability and data use. The objective of this study is to examine the primary literature for evidence-based recommendations on how to design and establish a cancer registry, with a focus on literature which analyses the performance and usefulness of already established registries or guidelines.

Methods: An electronic search was completed in MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMCARE, SCOPUS and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Recommendations were extracted from the identified articles and collated as themes.

Results: Nine articles of varying quality were included in the review. Recommendations obtained from the literature included broad themes of the importance of clinician involvement, establishment of clear data definitions, number of variables used, inbuilt strategies to improve quality and completeness of data, considerations of costs, an 'opt-out' strategy for ethics and privacy and flexibility of the system.

Conclusion: This review concluded that there is a large gap in the primary literature for evidence-based recommendations on the design and establishment of cancer registries. The included articles established a small scope of relevant themes, which were largely non-specific. This area of deficiency provides an opportunity for future research, which would further strengthen the quality of current or new guidelines in cancer registry establishment.

Keywords: cancer; database; neoplasm; registry; review.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Jensen O, Parkin D, Maclennan R, Muir C, Skeet R. Cancer Registration: Principles and Methods. International Agency for Research on Cancer Technical Publication No. 95. 1991. [Cited in Population (French Edition), 47: 250].
    1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Cancer (Clinical) NBPDS. Sydney: Commonwealth of Australia; 2015. [Cited 14 Jan 2019.] Available from URL: https://canceraustralia.gov.au/research-data/data/data-set-development.
    1. Bray F, Znaor A, Cueva P et al. Planning and Developing Population Based Cancer Registration in Low and Middle-Income Settings. International Agency for Research on Cancer Technical Publication No. 43. 2015. [Cited 1 Dec 2019.] Available from URL: http://www.iarc.fr/en/publications/pdfs-online/treport-pub/treport-pub43...
    1. Roder D, Creighton N, Baker D, Walton R, Aranda S, Currow D. Changing roles of population-based cancer registries in Australia. Aust. Health Rev. 2015; 39: 425-8.
    1. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. Framework for Australian Clinical Quality Registries. Sydney: Commonwealth of Australia, 2014. [Cited 1 Feb 2020.] Available from URL: https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Framework....

LinkOut - more resources