'What research was carried out on this vaginal mesh?' Health-related concerns in women following mesh-augmented prolapse surgery: a thematic analysis
- PMID: 32567211
- DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.16331
'What research was carried out on this vaginal mesh?' Health-related concerns in women following mesh-augmented prolapse surgery: a thematic analysis
Abstract
Objective: To understand health-related issues in women following mesh-augmented prolapse surgery.
Design: Inductive thematic analysis of free-text comments from participants in a cross-sectional study of laparoscopic mesh sacrohysteropexy.
Setting: Tertiary urogynaecology centres, United Kingdom.
Population: Women who underwent laparoscopic mesh sacrohysteropexy by surgeons based at two tertiary urogynaecology centres between 2010 and 2018.
Methods: A total of 1766 potential participants were contacted by post and invited to complete paper, online or telephone questionnaires containing a free-text comments section. Of 1121 participants (response proportion 63.5%), 752 (67.1%) provided such comments. These were analysed with a six-stage inductive thematic analysis, using NVivo 11® software.
Main outcome measures: Themes developed from free-text comments.
Results: Following familiarisation, 29 codes and 189 sub-codes were identified. These defined six themes: pelvic floor symptoms, health status, treatment success, mesh, pain and care received. The majority of comments centred on the first of these six themes. There were concerns about mesh use and a desire for more information. A range of pain symptoms were mentioned, often associated with pelvic floor symptoms, prolapse surgery or mesh.
Conclusions: Despite the mesh controversy, pelvic floor symptoms and their impact on quality of life remain the principle concern of women following mesh-augmented prolapse surgery. There is a need for quality, accessible and evidence-based information sources for those women with concerns, and for those considering such surgery in the future, particularly regarding mesh safety and postoperative recovery. The relationships between pain, prolapse, mesh and pelvic floor surgery require further study.
Tweetable abstract: Following mesh-augmented prolapse surgery, pelvic floor symptoms remain women's main focus; pain deserves further research.
Keywords: Laparoscopy; pain; pelvic organ prolapse; qualitative; surgical mesh.
© 2020 The Authors. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.
Comment in
-
Free-text patient experience data inform service development.BJOG. 2021 Jan;128(1):140. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16394. Epub 2020 Aug 2. BJOG. 2021. PMID: 32621403 No abstract available.
References
-
- Heneghan CJ, Goldacre B, Onakpoya I, Aronson JK, Jefferson T, Pluddemann A, et al. Trials of transvaginal mesh devices for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic database review of the US FDA approval process. BMJ Open 2017;7:e017125.
-
- Gornall J. How mesh became a four letter word. BMJ 2018;363:k4137.
-
- Independent Medicines and Medical Devices Safety Review. [cited 2019]; Available from: http://www.immdsreview.org.uk/.
-
- Morling JR, McAllister DA, Agur W, Fischbacher CM, Glazener CM, Guerrero K, et al. Adverse events after first, single, mesh and non-mesh surgical procedures for stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse in Scotland, 1997-2016: a population-based cohort study. Lancet 2017;389:629-40.
-
- Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 1997;89:501-6.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
