Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Oct;42(5):636-642.
doi: 10.1111/ijlh.13267. Epub 2020 Jun 22.

Evaluation of DOAC Filter, a new device to remove direct oral anticoagulants from plasma samples

Affiliations

Evaluation of DOAC Filter, a new device to remove direct oral anticoagulants from plasma samples

Pierre-Olivier Sevenet et al. Int J Lab Hematol. 2020 Oct.

Abstract

Introduction: Directs oral anticoagulants (DOACs) can interfere with coagulation assays, especially in thrombophilia workup. To avoid these interferences, a new device, DOAC Filter, allows the removal of DOACs from citrated plasma. This study aims to confirm that DOAC Filter efficiently removes DOACs and to ascertain that coagulation assays are not impacted by filtration.

Methods: Directs oral anticoagulants Filter (Diagnostica Stago, France) is a filtration cartridge in which DOAC molecules are trapped by noncovalent binding, while plasma is filtered through a solid phase. Normal pool plasma (NPP) spiked with DOACs up to 300 ng/mL, with dabigatran etexilate (n = 27), rivaroxaban (n = 35), apixaban (n = 33), and edoxaban (n = 27) or 120 ng/mL for betrixaban (n = 4), and 18 plasma's samples from DOAC-treated patients were used to assess efficacy. The potential impact of DOAC Filter on coagulation assays was evaluated with NPP and plasma's samples from positive and negative lupus anticoagulant (LA) patients.

Results: Directs oral anticoagulants concentrations measured after filtration were below the limit of detection (LoD) of DOAC-specific assays for all plasmas tested, except for one apixaban plasma sample, with postfiltration concentration slightly higher than anti-Xa assay LoD (25.1 ng/mL). Coagulation assays results varied between -4 and +8% after filtration and between -6 and +8% for LA plasmas. Such limited variations are not expected to have any clinical impact.

Conclusion: Directs oral anticoagulants Filter efficiently removes DOACs from plasma and achieves concentrations below DOAC-specific assays LoD, except in the case of one apixaban sample. The integrity of plasma is respected, and the cartridge seems not to impact LA diagnosis.

Keywords: DOAC Filter; apixaban; dabigatran; lupus anticoagulant; rivaroxaban; thrombophilia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

REFERENCES

    1. Cohen AT, Hamilton M, Mitchell SA, et al. Comparison of the novel oral anticoagulants apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban in the initial and long-term treatment and prevention of venous thromboembolism: systematic review and network meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2015;10(12):e0144856.
    1. Cohen AT, Hill NR, Luo X, Masseria C, Abariga SA, Ashaye AO. A systematic review of network meta-analyses among patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: a comparison of efficacy and safety following treatment with direct oral anticoagulants. Int J Cardiol. 2018;269:174-181.
    1. Ten Cate H, Henskens YM, Lancé MD. Practical guidance on the use of laboratory testing in the management of bleeding in patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2017;13:457-467.
    1. Eikelboom JW, Quinlan DJ, Hirsh J, Connolly SJ, Weitz JI. Laboratory monitoring of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant use in patients with atrial fibrillation: a review. JAMA Cardiol. 2017;2(5):566-574.
    1. Lee LH. DOACs - advances and limitations in real world. Thromb J. 2016;14(Suppl 1):17.

MeSH terms

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources