Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2020 Jun 22;22(6):e14073.
doi: 10.2196/14073.

An Intervention Delivered by Mobile Phone Instant Messaging to Increase Acceptability and Use of Effective Contraception Among Young Women in Bolivia: Randomized Controlled Trial

Ona L McCarthy  1 , Carolina Aliaga  2 , Maria Eugenia Torrico Palacios  2 , Jhonny López Gallardo  2 , Silvia Huaynoca  3 , Baptiste Leurent  1 , Phil Edwards  1 , Melissa Palmer  1 , Irrfan Ahamed  1 , Caroline Free  1
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

An Intervention Delivered by Mobile Phone Instant Messaging to Increase Acceptability and Use of Effective Contraception Among Young Women in Bolivia: Randomized Controlled Trial

Ona L McCarthy et al. J Med Internet Res. .

Abstract

Background: Although the most effective methods of contraception are available in Bolivia, unmet need for contraception among women aged 15 to 19 years is estimated to be 38% (2008), and the adolescent fertility rate is 71 per 1000 women (2016). Mobile phones are a popular mode to deliver health behavior support. We developed a contraceptive behavioral intervention for young Bolivian women delivered by mobile phone and guided by behavioral science. The intervention consists of short instant messages sent through an app over 4 months.

Objective: This trial aimed to evaluate the effect of the intervention on young Bolivian women's use of and attitudes toward the effective contraceptive methods available in Bolivia.

Methods: This was a parallel group, individually randomized superiority trial with a 1:1 allocation ratio. Women were eligible if they were aged 16 to 24 years, owned a personal Android mobile phone, lived in La Paz or El Alto, reported an unmet need for contraception, and could read Spanish. The target sample size was 1310 participants. Participants allocated to the intervention had access to an app with standard family planning information and intervention messages. Participants allocated to the control group had access to the same app and control messages. Coprimary outcomes were use of effective contraception and acceptability of at least one method of effective contraception at 4 months. Secondary outcomes were use of effective contraception during the study, acceptability of the individual methods, service uptake, unintended pregnancy, and abortion. Process outcomes included knowledge, perceived norms, personal agency, and intention. Outcomes were analyzed using logistic and linear regression. We also asked participants about physical violence.

Results: A total of 640 participants were enrolled, and 67.0% (429) of them contributed follow-up data for the coprimary outcome, the use of effective contraception. There was no evidence that use differed between the groups (33% control vs 37% intervention; adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.19, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.77; P=.40). There was a borderline significant effect regarding acceptability (63% control vs 72% intervention; adjusted OR 1.49, 95% CI 0.98 to 2.28; P=.06). There were no statistically significant differences in any of the secondary or process outcomes. The intervention dose received was low. In the control group, 2.8% (6/207) reported experiencing physical violence compared with 1.9% (4/202) in the intervention group (Fisher exact test P=.75).

Conclusions: This trial was unable to provide definitive conclusions regarding the effect of the intervention on use and acceptability of effective contraception because of under recruitment. Although we cannot strongly recommend implementation, the results suggest that it would be safe and may increase the acceptability of effective contraception if the intervention messages were offered alongside the download of the app.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02905526; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02905526.

Keywords: Bolivia; cellphone; contraception; mobile phone; reproductive health; young adults.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Trial flow diagram.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Intervention effect on the use of effective contraception by subgroups.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Intervention effect on the acceptability of effective contraception by subgroups.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Hardee K, Eggleston E, Wong EL, Irwanto. Hull TH. Unintended pregnancy and women's psychological well-being in Indonesia. J Biosoc Sci. 2004 Sep;36(5):617–26. doi: 10.1017/s0021932003006321. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gipson JD, Koenig MA, Hindin MJ. The effects of unintended pregnancy on infant, child, and parental health: a review of the literature. Stud Fam Plann. 2008 Mar;39(1):18–38. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2008.00148.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Marston C, Cleland J. Do unintended pregnancies carried to term lead to adverse outcomes for mother and child? An assessment in five developing countries. Popul Stud (Camb) 2003;57(1):77–93. doi: 10.1080/0032472032000061749.7Q8W005FA8UM0K71 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shah PS, Balkhair T, Ohlsson A, Beyene J, Scott F, Frick C. Intention to become pregnant and low birth weight and preterm birth: a systematic review. Matern Child Health J. 2011 Feb;15(2):205–16. doi: 10.1007/s10995-009-0546-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mohllajee AP, Curtis KM, Morrow B, Marchbanks PA. Pregnancy intention and its relationship to birth and maternal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Mar;109(3):678–86. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000255666.78427.c5.109/3/678 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data