Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jun 22;14(6):e0008398.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008398. eCollection 2020 Jun.

Access to Chagas disease treatment in the United States after the regulatory approval of benznidazole

Affiliations

Access to Chagas disease treatment in the United States after the regulatory approval of benznidazole

Kota Yoshioka et al. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. .

Abstract

Approximately 300,000 persons in the United States (US) are infected with Trypanosoma cruzi, the protozoan that causes Chagas disease, but less than 1% are estimated to have received antiparasitic treatment. Benznidazole was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for treatment of T. cruzi infection in 2017 and commercialized in May 2018. This paper analyzes factors that affect access to benznidazole following commercialization and suggests directions for future actions to expand access. We applied an access framework to identify barriers, facilitators, and key actors that influence the ability of people with Chagas disease to receive appropriate treatment with benznidazole. Data were collected from the published literature, key informants, and commercial databases. We found that the mean number of persons who obtained benznidazole increased from just under 5 when distributed by the CDC to 13 per month after the commercial launch (from May 2018 to February 2019). Nine key barriers to access were identified: lack of multi-sector coordination, failure of health care providers to use a specific order form, lack of an emergency delivery system, high medical costs for uninsured patients, narrow indications for use of benznidazole, lack of treatment guidelines, limited number of qualified treaters, difficulties for patients to make medical appointments, and inadequate evaluation by providers to determine eligibility for treatment. Our analysis shows that access to benznidazole is still limited after FDA approval. We suggest six areas for strategic action for the pharmaceutical company that markets benznidazole and its allied private foundation to expand access to benznidazole in the US. In addition, we recommend expanding the existing researcher-clinician network by including government agencies, companies and others. This paper's approach could be applied to access programs for benznidazole in other countries or for other health products that target neglected populations throughout the world.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

I have read the journal's policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following potential competing interests. KY was a graduate student at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health and this study was a part of his doctoral project financially sponsored by Fundación Mundo Sano. MRR received a grant from Fundación Mundo Sano to organize a workshop titled “Rethinking Chagas” at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, on October 22, 2018." This paper represents the work of the authors and should not be taken as representing either FMS or Exeltis USA. JMG was supported by Grant Number T32 AI007433 from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. The contents of this research are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Access framework for benznidazole in the United States.
Adapted from Frost and Reich [15].
Fig 2
Fig 2. Box plot showing durations in days between the dates when benznidazole is prescribed and dispensed for 129 patients, May 2018 to February 2019.
Source: Exeltis USA.

References

    1. Bern C, Montgomery SP. An estimate of the burden of Chagas disease in the United States. Clin Infect Dis. 2009. September;49(5):e52–54. 10.1086/605091 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Manne-Goehler J, Umeh CA, Montgomery SP, Wirtz VJ. Estimating the Burden of Chagas Disease in the United States. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016. November;10(11):e0005033 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005033 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Meymandi S, Forsyth CJ, Soverow J, Hernandez S, Sanchez D, Montgomery SP, et al. Prevalence of Chagas Disease in the Latin American–born Population of Los Angeles. Clin Infect Dis. 2017. May 1;64(9):1182–8. 10.1093/cid/cix064 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lee BY, Bacon KM, Bottazzi ME, Hotez PJ. Global economic burden of Chagas disease: a computational simulation model. Lancet Infect Dis. 2013. April;13(4):342–8. 10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70002-1 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bern C. Chagas’ Disease. N Engl J Med. 2015. July;373(5):456–66. 10.1056/NEJMra1410150 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms