Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comment
. 2021 Mar;55(1):198-211.
doi: 10.1007/s12124-020-09543-2.

Inching Toward a Unified Metatheory for Psychology

Michael F Mascolo  1
Affiliations
Comment

Inching Toward a Unified Metatheory for Psychology

Michael F Mascolo. Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2021 Mar.

Abstract

Zagaria et al. (2020) have aptly suggested that as a discipline, psychology is a giant with feet of clay. Drawing on the content of introductory textbooks, the authors show that there is little coherence and consensus about the meaning of key psychological terms - including such terms as psychology, mind, behavior. Drawing on evidence marking psychology is a "soft" science, the authors suggest that psychology can profit by adopting the "hard" foundation of evolutionary psychology as its metatheory. While Zagaria et al.'s characterization of psychology's fractious foundation has deep merit, their desire to erect a psychological metatheory on evolutionary psychology is unlikely to solve the problem they so aptly identify. At the least, I suggest a unified metatheory must: (a) establish a shared psychological lexicon; (b) elaborate a methodology that coordinates first-, second- and third-person modes of inquiry, and (c) develop a process model that describes psychological functioning at the biological, psychological and socio-cultural levels of analysis. To illustrate, I describe how contemporary relational and systems frameworks provide a framework that can move us in these directions.

Keywords: Evolutionary psychology; Intersubjectivity; Metatheory; Mind; Psychology; Unification.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment on

  • Psychology: a Giant with Feet of Clay.
    Zagaria A, Ando' A, Zennaro A. Zagaria A, et al. Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2020 Sep;54(3):521-562. doi: 10.1007/s12124-020-09524-5. Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2020. PMID: 32297037

References

    1. Bardi, L. (2017). Biological motion perception. In B. Hopkins, E. Geangu, & S. Linkenauger (Eds.), The Cambridge encyclopedia of child development (2nd ed., pp. 271–276). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    1. Barrett, L., Pollet, T. V., & Stulp, G. (2014). From computers to cultivation: Reconceptualizing evolutionary psychology. Frontiers in Psychology, 5.
    1. Bidell, T. (2020). Philosophical background to integrative theories of human development. In M. F. Mascolo & T. Bidell (Eds.), Handbook of integrative psychological development (pp. 2–37). New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis.
    1. Bretherton, I., & Beeghly, M. (1982). Talking about internal states: The acquisition of an explicit theory of mind. Developmental Psychology, 18(6), 906–921.
    1. De Jaegher, H., & Di Paolo, E. (2008). Making sense in participation: An enactive approach to social cognition. In F. Morganti, A. Carassa, G. Riva, F. Morganti, A. Carassa, & G. Riva (Eds.), Enacting intersubjectivity: A cognitive and social perspective on the study of interactions (pp. 33–47). Amsterdam: IOS Press.

LinkOut - more resources