Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Aug:258:113138.
doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113138. Epub 2020 Jun 16.

Considerations for employing intersectionality in qualitative health research

Affiliations
Review

Considerations for employing intersectionality in qualitative health research

Jasmine A Abrams et al. Soc Sci Med. 2020 Aug.

Abstract

Intersectionality theory has recently emerged in the health sciences as a critical theoretical and methodical approach. Though some scholars have outlined explicit guidelines for applying intersectionality in research using quantitative methods, others have cited epistemological concerns and additive thinking to advocate for the analysis of intersectionality with qualitative methods. Thus, there remains a need for additional guidance and support for utilizing and applying intersectionality theory throughout the qualitative research process. With the goal of demystifying the process of utilizing intersectionality as a methodological approach in qualitative research in the health sciences, this paper provides researchers with recommendations, specific examples, and important considerations for incorporating intersectional approaches into study conceptualization, participant recruitment, data collection, and data analysis. Additionally, this paper reviews challenges that researchers may experience in conducting research using intersectional approaches and offers suggestions for overcoming challenges. This paper offers timely and relevant information that can be used to strengthen the theoretical and methodological rigor of qualitative health research, especially studies that seek to advance health equity.

Keywords: Health disparities; Health equity; Intersectionality research methods; Qualitative inquiry; Qualitative research methods.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Agee J (2009). Developing qualitative research questions: a reflective process. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 22(4), 431–447. 10.1080/09518390902736512 - DOI
    1. Agénor M, Bailey Z, Krieger N, Austin SB, & Gottlieb BR (2015). Exploring the cervical cancer screening experiences of black lesbian, bisexual, and queer women: The role of patient-provider communication. Women & Health, 55(6), 717–736. 10.1080/03630242.2015.1039182 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Agénor M, Krieger N, Austin SB, Haneuse S, & Gottlieb BR (2014). At the intersection of sexual orientation, race/ethnicity, and cervical cancer screening: Assessing Pap test use disparities by sex of sexual partners among black, Latina, and white U.S. women. Social Science & Medicine, 116, 110–118. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.06.039 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Agénor M, Jahn JL, Kay E, Bishop RA, Peitzmeier SM, Potter J, & Austin SB (2019). Human papillomavirus risk perceptions among young adult sexual minority cisgender women and nonbinary individuals assigned female at birth. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 51, 27–34. 10.1363/psrh.12087 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alegría M, Canino G, Rios R, Vera M, Calderon J, Rusch D, & Ortega AN (2002). Inequalities in use of specialty mental health services among Latinos, African Americans, and Non-Latino Whites. Psychiatric Services, 53(12), 1547–1555. 10.1176/appi.ps.53.12.1547 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types