Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan;128(1):46-53.
doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16379. Epub 2020 Aug 5.

Predicting risk of postpartum haemorrhage: a systematic review

C Neary  1 , S Naheed  2 , D J McLernon  3 , M Black  4
Affiliations

Predicting risk of postpartum haemorrhage: a systematic review

C Neary et al. BJOG. 2021 Jan.

Abstract

Background: Postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) causes substantial morbidity and mortality worldwide. A reliable prognostic tool for PPH has potential to aid prevention efforts.

Objective: Systematically to identify and appraise prognostic modelling studies for prediction of PPH.

Search strategy: MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and the Cochrane Library were searched using a combination of terms and synonyms including 'prediction tool', 'risk score' and 'postpartum haemorrhage'.

Selection criteria: Any observational or experimental study developing a prognostic model for women's risk of PPH. English language publications.

Data collection and analysis: Predesigned data extraction form to record: data source; participant criteria; outcome; candidate predictors; actual predictors; sample size; missing data; model development; model performance; model evaluation; interpretation.

Main results: Of 2146 citations screened, 14 studies were eligible for inclusion. Studies addressed populations of women who experienced placenta praevia, placenta accreta spectrum, vaginal birth, caesarean birth (CS) and the general obstetric population. All studies were at high risk of bias due to low sample size, no internal validation, suboptimal or no external validation or no reporting or handling of missing data. Five studies raised applicability concerns. Three externally validated and three internally validated studies show potential for robust external validation.

Conclusion: Of 14 prognostic models for PPH risk, three have some potential for clinical use: in CS, in placenta accreta spectrum disorders with MRI placental Evaluation and in placenta praevia. Future research requires robust internal and external validation of existing tools and development of a model for use in the general obstetric population.

Tweetable abstract: Current PPH prediction tools need external validation: one for CS, one for placenta praevia and one for placenta accreta. Tools are needed for labouring women.

Keywords: Postpartum haemorrhage; prediction model; prediction tool.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Knight M, Nair M, Tuffnell D, Shakespeare J, Kenyon S, Kurinczuk J. Saving Lives, Improving Mothers' Care--Lessons Learned to Inform Maternity Care from the UK and Ireland Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths and Morbidity 2013-15. Kidlington: Oxiuniprint; 2017. p. 104.
    1. Khan KS, Wojdyla D, Say L, Gülmezoglu AM, Van Look PF. WHO analysis of causes of maternal death: a systematic review. Lancet 2006;367:1066-74.
    1. Knight M, Callaghan WM, Berg C, Alexander S, Bouvier-Colle MH, Ford J, et al. Trends in postpartum hemorrhage in high resource countries: a review and recommendations from the International Postpartum Hemorrhage Collaborative Group. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2009;9:55.
    1. Mousa HA, Blum J, Abou El Senoun G, Shakur H, Alfirevic Z. Treatment for primary postpartum haemorrhage. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014;(2):CD003249.
    1. Chandraharan E, Krishna A. Diagnosis and management of postpartum haemorrhage. BMJ 2017;358:j3875.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources