Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jun 19;10(6):1064.
doi: 10.3390/ani10061064.

Owner-Related Reasons Matter more than Behavioural Problems-A Study of Why Owners Relinquished Dogs and Cats to a Danish Animal Shelter from 1996 to 2017

Janne B H Jensen  1 , Peter Sandøe  1   2 , Søren Saxmose Nielsen  1
Affiliations

Owner-Related Reasons Matter more than Behavioural Problems-A Study of Why Owners Relinquished Dogs and Cats to a Danish Animal Shelter from 1996 to 2017

Janne B H Jensen et al. Animals (Basel). .

Abstract

Every year, dogs and cats are relinquished to animal shelters by their owners in large numbers. Reasons for relinquishment of dogs and cats to a large Danish shelter from 1996 to 2017 were obtained and characterised. The reasons were available for 86% of the owner-relinquished animals, including 3204 dog relinquishments (90%) and 2755 cat relinquishments (82%). They were allocated to 59 categories, which were further merged into four owner-related and three animal-related reasons. The most commonly reported of these seven reasons for relinquishment of dogs were owner health (29%), animal behavioural problems (23%), housing issues (21%) and lack of time (14%). For cats, the figures were: owner health (32%), housing issues (26%), and animal behavioural problems (25%). No systematic changes in these patterns were found over time. The number of relinquished cats was roughly stable, whereas the number of relinquished dogs decreased on average by 3% per annum. Owner issues were the primary reason for relinquishment in both species, but nearly one-quarter of the animals were relinquished as a result of behavioural problems. As the latter are often connected with the owner in some way, the results emphasise the importance of a focus on owners when addressing pet relinquishment challenges.

Keywords: Denmark; animal shelter; canine; cat; dog; feline; owner; relinquishment; relinquishment reasons.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Annual number of owner-relinquished dogs and cats at a large Danish shelter from 1996 to 2017.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Reasons for relinquishment related to the owner from 1996 to 2017. Illustration of the merging and characterisation of owner-related reasons for relinquishment of dogs and cats. NSF: not specified further.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Reasons for relinquishment related to the animal from 1996 to 2017. Illustration of the merging and characterisation of animal-related reasons for relinquishment. NSF: not specified further.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Owner-related reasons for relinquishment (dogs). Proportional distribution of reported owner-related reasons for the relinquishment of dogs in a Danish animal shelter from 1996 to 2017.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Animal-related reasons for relinquishment (dogs). Proportional distribution of reported animal-related reasons for the relinquishment of dogs in a Danish animal shelter from 1996 to 2017.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Owner-related reasons for relinquishment (cats). Proportional distribution of reported owner-related reasons for the relinquishment of cats in a Danish animal shelter from 1996 to 2017.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Animal-related reasons for relinquishment (cats). Proportional distribution of reported animal-related reasons for the relinquishment of cats in a Danish animal shelter from 1996 to 2017.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Hirsch E.N., Andersson M., Loberg J. Swedish cat shelters: A descriptive survey of husbandry practices, routines and management. Anim. Welf. 2014;23:411–421. doi: 10.7120/09627286.23.4.411. - DOI
    1. Lord L.K., Wittum T.E., Ferketich A.K., Funk J.A., Rajala-Schultz P., Kauffman R.M. Demographic trends for animal care and control agencies in Ohio from 1996 to 2004. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2006;229:48–54. doi: 10.2460/javma.229.1.48. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Morris K.N., Gies D.L. Trends in intake and outcome data for animal shelters in a large US Metropolitan area, 1989 to 2010. J. Appl. Anim. Welf. Sci. 2014;17:59–72. doi: 10.1080/10888705.2014.856250. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stavisky J., Brennan M.L., Downes M., Dean R. Demographics and economic burden of un-owned cats and dogs in the UK: Results of a 2010 census. BMC Vet. Res. 2012;8:163. doi: 10.1186/1746-6148-8-163. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wenstrup J., Dowidchuk A. Pet overpopulation: Data and measurement issues in shelters. J. Appl. Anim. Welf. Sci. 1999;2:303–319. doi: 10.1207/s15327604jaws0204_5. - DOI - PubMed