Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Oct;13(4):100932.
doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2020.100932. Epub 2020 Apr 20.

Ask and ye shall not receive: Interpreter-related access barriers reported by Deaf users of American sign language

Affiliations

Ask and ye shall not receive: Interpreter-related access barriers reported by Deaf users of American sign language

Elizabeth Schniedewind et al. Disabil Health J. 2020 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Healthcare providers are mandated to provide reasonable accommodations for Deaf users of American Sign Language (ASL) accessing healthcare services, including ASL interpreters. Provision of accommodations improves access and provider/patient communication.

Objective: Describe the types, frequency, severity, and trends in healthcare access complications experienced by Deaf patients.

Methods: A six-year retrospective review of complaints (n = 108) filed regarding interpreter provision in healthcare settings with the Idaho Council for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing by Deaf users of ASL was conducted and summarized. An analysis of demographic and language factors associated with interpreter-related barriers and whether the complaint was resolved was performed using multivariate logistic regression.

Results: Reasons for complaints of interpreter-related barriers to care included: 48.2% were "told an interpreter was not available"; 28.7% received an unqualified interpreter; interpreter was promised but not provided (18.5%). Factors independently associated with having been promised an interpreter were: medical clinics (vs. dental) (OR 3.92 95%CI 1.18-12.98), and complaints filed later in the study period (OR 1.55 per year 95%CI 1.19-2.01). For each additional year during the study period, complaints were 1.6 times (95%CI 1.15-2.22) more likely to have an interpreter promised but not provided. Patients from rural areas were less likely to have their complaints satisfactorily resolved (OR 0.18 95%CI 0.06-0.55).

Conclusion: Deaf patients experience various interpreter-related barriers throughout the process of accessing healthcare and communicating with providers/staff, though further regional and nationwide documentation is warranted.

Keywords: (Barrier; Accessibility; Complaint; Deaf; Discrimination); Health services; Interpreter; Sign language.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources