Letter to the Editor concerning "Comparison of Stand-alone Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Open Laminectomy and Posterolateral Instrumented Fusion in the Treatment of Adjacent Segment Disease Following Previous Lumbar Fusion Surgery" by Louie et al

Affiliations

Comment

Tadatsugu Morimoto et al. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020.

. 2020 Sep 1;45(17):E1132.

doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003590.

¹ Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, Saga-city, Japan.

No abstract available

Comment in

Comparison of Stand-alone Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Open Laminectomy and Posterolateral Instrumented Fusion in the Treatment of Adjacent Segment Disease Following Previous Lumbar Fusion Surgery.
Louie PK, Haws BE, Khan JM, Markowitz J, Movassaghi K, Ferguson J, Lopez GD, An HS, Phillips FM. Louie PK, et al. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 Dec 15;44(24):E1461-E1469. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003191. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019. PMID: 31415471

1. Louie PK, Haws BE, Khan JM, et al. Comparison of stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion versus open laminectomy and posterolateral instrumented fusion in the treatment of adjacent segment disease following previous lumbar fusion surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2019; 44:E1461–E1469.
1. Abe K, Orita S, Mannoji C, et al. Perioperative complications in 155 patients who underwent oblique lateral interbody fusion surgery perspectives and indications from a retrospective, multicenter survey. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2017; 42:55–62.
1. Formica M, Vallerga D, Zanirato A, et al. Fusion rate and influence of surgery–related factors in lumbar interbody arthrodesis for degenerative spine diseases: a meta–analysis and systematic review. Musculoskelet Surg 2020; 104:1–15.