Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2021 Mar;60(1):1-37.
doi: 10.1111/bjc.12259. Epub 2020 Jun 23.

Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) in the United Kingdom: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 10-years of practice-based evidence

Sarah Wakefield  1 , Stephen Kellett  2 , Melanie Simmonds-Buckley  1 , Daniel Stockton  3 , Abigail Bradbury  1 , Jaime Delgadillo  1
Affiliations
Free article
Meta-Analysis

Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) in the United Kingdom: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 10-years of practice-based evidence

Sarah Wakefield et al. Br J Clin Psychol. 2021 Mar.
Free article

Abstract

Objectives: Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) is a national-level dissemination programme for provision of evidence-based psychological treatments for anxiety and depression in the United Kingdom. This paper sought to review and meta-analyse practice-based evidence arising from the programme.

Design: A pre-registered (CRD42018114796) systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods: A random effects meta-analysis was performed only on the practice-based IAPT studies (i.e. excluding the clinical trials). Subgroup analyses examined the potential influence of particular methodologies, treatments, populations, and target conditions. Sensitivity analyses investigated potential sources of heterogeneity and bias.

Results: The systematic review identified N = 60 studies, with N = 47 studies suitable for meta-analysis. The primary meta-analysis showed large pre-post treatment effect sizes for depression (d = 0.87, 95% CI [0.78-0.96], p < .0001) and anxiety (d = 0.88, 95% CI [0.79-0.97], p < .0001), and a moderate effect on functional impairment (d = 0.55, 95% CI [0.48-0.61], p < .0001). The methodological features of studies influenced ESs (e.g., such as whether intention-to-treat or completer analyses were employed).

Conclusions: Current evidence suggests that IAPT enables access to broadly effective evidence-based psychological therapies for large numbers of patients. The limitations of the review and the clinical and methodological implications are discussed.

Practitioner points: IAPT interventions are associated with large pre-post treatment effect sizes in depression and anxiety measures. IAPT interventions are associated with moderate treatment effect sizes with regards to work and social adjustment. A reduction in dropout and also the prevention of post-treatment relapse via the offer of follow-up support are important areas for future development.

Keywords: Improving Access to Psychological Therapies; anxiety; depression; meta-analysis; outcome measures.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Adamson, V., Gibbs, M., & McLaughlin, D. (2015). Evaluation of the improving access to psychological therapies for offenders programme at HMP Lincoln: A three-year prospective cohort study. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 26, 185-201. https://doi.org/10.1080/14789949.2014.985695
    1. Ali, S., Littlewood, E., McMillan, D., Delgadillo, J., Miranda, A., Croudace, T., & Gilbody, S. (2014). Heterogeneity in patient-reported outcomes following low-intensity mental health interventions: A multilevel analysis. PLoS One, 9, e99658. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099658
    1. Ali, S., Rhodes, L., Moreea, O., McMillan, D., Gilbody, S., Leach, C., … Delgadillo, J. (2017). How durable is the effect of low intensity CBT for depression and anxiety? Remission and relapse in a longitudinal cohort study. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 94, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2017.04.006
    1. Armijo-Olivo, S., Ospina, M., da Costa, B. R., Egger, M., Saltaji, H., Fuentes, J., … Cummings, G. G. (2014). Poor reliability between Cochrane reviewers and blinded external reviewers when applying the Cochrane risk of bias tool in physical therapy trials. PLoS One, 9, e96920. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096920
    1. Baker, T. B., McFall, R. M., & Shoham, V. (2009). Current status and future prospects of clinical psychology: Toward a scientifically principled approach to mental and behavioral health. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 9, 67-103. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6053.2009.01036.x

LinkOut - more resources