Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Aug;9(16):6030-6041.
doi: 10.1002/cam4.3180. Epub 2020 Jun 23.

Sex differences in solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas: A population-based study

Affiliations

Sex differences in solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas: A population-based study

Jiali Wu et al. Cancer Med. 2020 Aug.

Abstract

Objective: Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN) of the pancreas is a rare tumor. This study aims to examine the clinicopathological features and surgical treatments of SPN and compare the clinical behavior and prognosis between men and women with SPN.

Methods: We collected the population data of patients with SPN diagnosed between 2004 and 2017 from the SEER database. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS), and log-rank tests were used to evaluate the differences between subgroups. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to screen out prognostic risk factors of SPN.

Results: A total of 378 patients with SPN were included, with 246 (65.1%) female patients. 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates were 98.9%, 95.7%, and 93.7%, respectively. Survival analysis revealed that regardless of stage, patients with SPN who underwent surgical interventions still had a significantly better prognosis than those without surgical interventions (P < .001). The patients with lymphatic dissection had a significantly better prognosis than those without lymphatic dissection (P < .001). Moreover, compared with female patients, male patients had significantly poorer OS and DSS (P < .001). Female SPN showed a bimodal age-frequency distribution with early-onset incidence at 28 years and late-onset peak incidence at 62 years, while male SPN presented a unimodal distribution with peak incidence at approximately age 64 years. In female patients, the tumor size in premenopausal females (<65 years old) was significantly larger than that in postmenopausal females (≥65 years old) (P < .001). Clinicopathological characteristic profiles were different not only between male SPN and premenopausal female SPN but also between premenopausal and postmenopausal female SPN.

Conclusion: SPN presents indolent behavior and predominantly occurs in young women. Regardless of stage, surgical intervention is recommended. Moreover, our study is the first large enough study to demonstrate sex-related discrepancies in SPN. Thus, different treatment strategies should be designed for patients of different sexes at different ages and hormone therapy is a promising approach for SPN.

Keywords: SEER; hormone; sex-related discrepancy; solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None of the authors have any potential conflict of interest to declare.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Flow diagram of patients selection in our study from the SEER database 2004‐2017
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN) exhibited indolent behaviors. A, Survival analysis for overall survival in patients with SPNs; B, Survival analysis for disease‐specific survival in patients with SPNs; C, Lymph nodes metastasis status in SEER cohorts; D, Distant metastasis status in SEER cohorts
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Survival analysis for overall survival and disease‐specific survival in patients with solid pseudopapillary neoplasm based on surgical intervention
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Survival analysis for overall survival and disease‐specific survival in patients with solid pseudopapillary neoplasm based on lymphadenectomy
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN) presented gender‐related discrepancies. A, Age‐gender distribution of male SPN and female SPN; B, Age‐frequency distribution of male SPN and female SPN; C, Survival analysis for overall survival and disease‐specific survival comparing male and female patients with SPN
FIGURE 6
FIGURE 6
The difference between premenopausal female and postmenopausal female. A, Survival analysis for overall survival and disease‐specific survival comparing premenopausal female and postmenopausal female with solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN); B, Tumor size distribution of SPN in premenopausal female and postmenopausal female

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kang CM, Choi SH, Kim SC, Lee WJ, Choi DW, Kim SW. Predicting recurrence of pancreatic solid pseudopapillary tumors after surgical resection: a multicenter analysis in Korea. Annals Surgery. 2014;260(2):348‐355. - PubMed
    1. de Castro SMM, Singhal D, Aronson DC, et al. Management of solid‐pseudopapillary neoplasms of the pancreas: a comparison with standard pancreatic neoplasms. World J Surg. 2007;31(5):1130‐1135. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Law JK, Ahmed A, Singh VK, et al. A systematic review of solid‐pseudopapillary neoplasms: are these rare lesions? Pancreas. 2014;43(3):331‐337. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Martin RC, Klimstra DS, Brennan MF, Conlon KC. Solid‐pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas: a surgical enigma? Ann Surg Oncol. 2002;9(1):35‐40. - PubMed
    1. Hu S, Zhang H, Wang X, et al. Asymptomatic versus symptomatic solid pseudopapillary tumors of the pancreas: clinical and MDCT manifestations. Cancer Imaging. 2019;19(1):13. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms