Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jun 24;71(Suppl 1):S43-S51.
doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa307.

The Traditional or Reverse Algorithm for Diagnosis of Syphilis: Pros and Cons

Daniel A Ortiz  1 , Mayur R Shukla  2 , Michael J Loeffelholz  1
Affiliations

The Traditional or Reverse Algorithm for Diagnosis of Syphilis: Pros and Cons

Daniel A Ortiz et al. Clin Infect Dis. .

Abstract

We reviewed relevant syphilis diagnostic literature to address the question "What diagnostic considerations should be taken into account when screening for syphilis using the traditional or reverse algorithm?" Improved laboratory diagnosis of syphilis is an important element of the effort to reduce syphilis rates. Screening for syphilis is performed using either a nontreponemal or treponemal test (part of the traditional or reverse algorithm, respectively). Both syphilis algorithms are used by laboratories. However, there are limited data on the performance and cost-effectiveness of the algorithms. An expert panel generated "key questions" in the laboratory diagnosis of syphilis. This paper pertains to the key factors that should be considered when deciding whether to screen for syphilis using either the traditional or the reverse algorithm. A systematic literature review was performed, and tables of evidence were created to address this question.

Keywords: Treponema pallidum; diagnostic algorithms; serology; syphilis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Rhoads DD, Genzen JR, Bashleben CP, Faix JD, Ansari MQ. Prevalence of traditional and reverse-algorithm syphilis screening in laboratory practice: a survey of participants in the College of American Pathologists Syphilis Serology Proficiency Testing Program. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2017; 141:93–7. - PubMed
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Syphilis testing algorithms using treponemal tests for initial screening—four laboratories, New York City, 2005–2006. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2008; 57:872–5. - PubMed
    1. Loeffelholz MJ, Binnicker MJ. It is time to use treponema-specific antibody screening tests for diagnosis of syphilis. J Clin Microbiol 2012; 50:2–6. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sexually transmitted disease surveillance 2016. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, 2017.
    1. Owusu-Edusei K Jr, Koski KA, Ballard RC. The tale of two serologic tests to screen for syphilis—treponemal and nontreponemal: does the order matter? Sex Transm Dis 2011; 38:448–56. - PubMed

Publication types