Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jun 24;71(Suppl 1):S13-S20.
doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa349.

Sensitivity and Specificity of Treponemal-specific Tests for the Diagnosis of Syphilis

Affiliations

Sensitivity and Specificity of Treponemal-specific Tests for the Diagnosis of Syphilis

Ina U Park et al. Clin Infect Dis. .

Abstract

We conducted a systematic review of relevant syphilis diagnostic literature to address the question, "What is the sensitivity and specificity of the treponemal tests currently approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the diagnosis of syphilis (by stage)?" There were 16 treponemal assays evaluated: 13 immunoassays and 3 manual assays (fluorescent treponemal antibody absorbed test [FTA-ABS], microhemagglutination assay for Treponema pallidum antibodies [MHA-TP], Treponema pallidum particle agglutination assay [TP-PA]). MHA-TP and FTA-ABS were less sensitive in primary and secondary syphilis than TP-PA; TP-PA is the most specific manual treponemal assay. There is insufficient evidence to recommend one particular treponemal immunoassay (eg, enzyme immunoassays, chemiluminescence immunoassays, microbead immunoassays) over another based on published performance data. For diagnosis of neurosyphilis, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) TP-PA has similar performance to CSF FTA-ABS in studies with patients with definitive or presumptive neurosyphilis. However, CSF treponemal testing has limitations in its sensitivity and specificity and should be interpreted within the context of the clinical scenario, additional CSF test results and syphilis prevalence.

Keywords: diagnostics; immunoassay; syphilis; test performance; treponemal.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Workowski KA, Bolan GA, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2015. MMWR Recomm Rep 2015; 64:1–137. Published correction appears in: MMWR Recomm Rep 2015;64(33):924. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Augenbraun M, Rolfs R, Johnson R, Joesoef R, Pope V. Treponemal specific tests for the serodiagnosis of syphilis. Syphilis and HIV Study Group. Sex Transm Dis 1998; 25:549–52. - PubMed
    1. Byrne RE, Laska S, Bell M, Larson D, Phillips J, Todd J. Evaluation of a Treponema pallidum western immunoblot assay as a confirmatory test for syphilis. J Clin Microbiol 1992; 30:115–22. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Coffey EM, Bradford LL, Naritomi LS, Wood RM. Evaluation of the qualitative and automated quantitative microhemagglutination assay for antibodies to Treponema pallidum. Appl Microbiol 1972; 24:26–30. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Farshy CE, Kennedy EJ, Hunter EF, Larsen SA. Fluorescent treponemal antibody absorption double-staining test evaluation. J Clin Microbiol 1983; 17:245–8. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances