Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jun 5:11:987.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00987. eCollection 2020.

A Radical Reassessment of the Body in Social Cognition

Affiliations

A Radical Reassessment of the Body in Social Cognition

Jessica Lindblom. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

The main issue addressed in this paper is to provide a reassessment of the role and relevance of the body in social cognition from a radical embodied cognitive science perspective. Initially, I provide a historical introduction of the traditional account of the body in cognitive science, which I here call the cognitivist view. I then present several lines of criticism raised against the cognitivist view advanced by more embodied, enacted and situated approaches in cognitive science, and related disciplines. Next, I analyze several approaches under the umbrella of embodied social cognition. My line of argument is that some of these approaches, although pointing toward the right direction of conceiving that the social mind is not merely contained inside the head, still fail to fully acknowledge the radically embodied social mind. I argue that the failure of these accounts of embodied social cognition could be associated with so-called 'simple embodiment.' The third part of this paper focuses on elaborating an alternative characterization of the radically embodied social mind that also tries to reduce the remaining problems with 'simple embodiment.' I draw upon two turns in radically embodied cognitive science, the enactive turn, and the intersubjective turn. On the one hand, there is the risk of focusing too much on the individual level in social cognition that may result in new kinds of methodological individualism that partly neglect the social dimension. On the other hand, socially distributed and socially extended approaches that pay more attention to the dynamics within social interaction may encounter the risk of ignoring the individual during social interaction dynamics and simultaneously not emphasizing the role of embodiment. The approach taken is to consider several ways of describing and incorporating the (individual) social mind at the social level that includes language. I outline some ideas and motivations for how to study and expand the field of radical embodied social cognition in the future, as well as pose the ubiquitous hazard of falling back into a cognitivism view in several ways.

Keywords: embodied social cognition; meaning-making; radical embodied cognition; sense-making; situatedness; social interaction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ackerman J. M., Nocera C. C., Bargh J. A. (2010). Incidental haptic sensations influence social judgments and decisions. Science 328 1712–1715. 10.1126/science.1189993 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Andersen S. M., Reznik I., Manzella L. M. (1996). Eliciting facial effect, motivation, and expectancies in transference; significant-other representations in social relations. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 71 1108–1129. 10.1037/0022-3514.71.6.1108 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anderson M. L., Richardson M. J., Chemero A. (2012). Eroding the boundaries of cognition: implications of embodiment. Top. Cogn. Sci. 4 717–730. 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2012.01211.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Augoustinos M., Walker I., Donaghue N. (2014). Social Cognition: An Integrated Introduction, 3rd Edn, London: Sage.
    1. Bargh J. A., Chen M., Burrows L. (1996). Automaticity of social behavior: direct effects of trait constructs and stereotype activation on action. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 71 230–244. 10.1037//0022-3514.71.2.230 - DOI - PubMed