Should I Stay or Should I Go? The Role of Motivational Climate and Work-Home Spillover for Turnover Intentions
- PMID: 32581947
- PMCID: PMC7286056
- DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01107
Should I Stay or Should I Go? The Role of Motivational Climate and Work-Home Spillover for Turnover Intentions
Abstract
Emerging trends in the workforce point to the necessity of facilitating work lives that foster constructive and balanced relationships between professional and private spheres in order to retain employees. Drawing on the conservation of resources theory, we propose that motivational climate influences turnover intention through the facilitation of work-home spillover. Specifically, we argue that employees working in a perceived mastery climate are less likely to consider voluntarily leaving their employer because of increased positive-and reduced negative-work-home spillover experiences. We further argue that employees working in a perceived performance climate are more likely to consider voluntarily leaving their employer because of reduced positive-and increased negative-work-home spillover experiences. In a cross-lagged survey of 1074 employees in a Norwegian financial-sector organization, we found that work-home spillover partly mediates the relationship between a perceived motivational climate and turnover intention. Specifically, mastery climates seem to facilitate positive-and reduce negative-spillover between the professional and private spheres, which in turn decreases employees' turnover intention. Contrary to our expectations, a perceived performance climate slightly increased both positive and negative work-home spillover, however increasing employees' turnover intention. We discuss implications for practice and future research.
Keywords: life-supportive workplaces; negative work–home spillover; perceived motivational climate; positive work–home spillover; turnover intention.
Copyright © 2020 Kopperud, Nerstad and Dysvik.
Figures
References
-
- Aboobaker N., Edward M. (2019). Collective influence of work–family conflict and work–family enrichment on turnover intention: exploring the moderating effects of individual differences. Global Bus. Rev. 1–14. 10.1177/0972150919857015 - DOI
-
- Ames C. (1984). “Competitive, cooperative, and individualistic goal structures: a cognitive-motivational analysis,” in Research on Motivation in Education, Vol. 1 eds Ames C., Ames R. (Florida: Academic Press, Inc; ), 177–207.
-
- Ames C. (1992a). “Achievement goals, motivational climate, and motivational processes,” in Motivation in Sport and Exercise, ed. Roberts G. C. (Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.). 10.1080/02640414.2010.530675 - DOI
-
- Ames C. (1992b). Classrooms: goals, structures, and student motivation. J. Educ. Psychol. 84 261–271. 10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.261 - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
