Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jun 9:11:1033.
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01033. eCollection 2020.

Adjuvanting Allergen Extracts for Sublingual Immunotherapy: Calcitriol Downregulates CXCL8 Production in Primary Sublingual Epithelial Cells

Affiliations

Adjuvanting Allergen Extracts for Sublingual Immunotherapy: Calcitriol Downregulates CXCL8 Production in Primary Sublingual Epithelial Cells

Michael P Pelst et al. Front Immunol. .

Abstract

Application of allergens onto the sublingual epithelium is used to desensitize allergic individuals, a treatment known as sublingual immunotherapy. However, the response of sublingual epithelial cells to house dust mite allergen and potential tolerance-promoting adjuvants such as Toll-like receptor (TLR) ligands and calcitriol has not been investigated. In order to study this, primary sublingual epithelial cells were isolated from dogs and cultured in vitro. After 24-h incubation with a Dermatophagoides farinae extract, a Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus extract, TLR2 ligands (FSL-1, heat-killed Listeria monocytogenes, Pam3CSK4), a TLR3 ligand (poly I:C), a TLR4 ligand [lipopolysaccharide (LPS)], and calcitriol (1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3), viability of the cells was analyzed using an MTT test, and their secretion of interleukin 6 (IL-6), IL-10, CXCL8, and transforming growth factor β1 (TGF-β1) was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Additionally, to evaluate its potential effect as an adjuvant, sublingual epithelial cells were incubated with calcitriol in combination with a D. farinae extract followed by measurement of CXCL8 secretion. Furthermore, the effect of D. farinae and calcitriol on the transcriptome was assessed by RNA sequencing. The viability of the sublingual epithelial cells was significantly decreased by poly I:C, but not by the other stimuli. CXCL8 secretion was significantly increased by D. farinae extract and all TLR ligands apart from LPS. Calcitriol significantly decreased CXCL8 secretion, and coadministration with D. farinae extract reduced CXCL8 concentrations to levels seen in unstimulated sublingual epithelial cells. Although detectable, TGF-β1 secretion could not be modulated by any of the stimuli. Interleukin 6 and IL-10 could not be detected at the protein or at the mRNA level. It can be concluded that a D. farinae extract and TLR ligands augment the secretion of the proinflammatory chemokine CXCL8, which might interfere with sublingual desensitization. On the other hand, CXCL8 secretion was reduced by coapplication of calcitriol and a D. farinae extract. Calcitriol therefore seems to be a suitable candidate to be used as adjuvant during sublingual immunotherapy.

Keywords: CXCL8; Dermatophagoides farinae; Toll-like receptor; calcitriol; dog; epithelium; sublingual; sublingual immunotherapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
CD49f is expressed by canine sublingual epithelial, but not by sublingual subepithelial cells. (A) Immunofluorescence of canine sublingual tissue in which cryosections were stained with CD49f (FITC) and counterstained with Hoechst. E = epithelium, S = subepithelial tissue. (B) Histograms generated by flow cytometric analysis that are representative for all donors. Isotype controls are given in red; stained cells are shown in green. (C) Flow cytometric analysis: mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of all samples stained with CD49f for sublingual epithelial cells (n = 6) and subepithelial cells (n = 4). Mean fluorescence intensity of the isotype control was subtracted from the MFI of the stained cells. Horizontal bars indicate the mean.
Figure 2
Figure 2
A Dermatophagoides farinae extract significantly increases CXCL8 secretion by canine sublingual epithelial cells (n = 6). The cells were cultured for 24 h with 20 μg/mL D. farinae extract or 20 μg/mL D. pteronyssinus extract and CXCL8 secretion was measured. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01 to control; paired Student t-test.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Ligands for TLR2 and TLR3 significantly increase CXCL8 secretion by canine sublingual epithelial cells (n = 6). The cells were cultured for 24 h with Pam3CSK4 at 1 μg/mL, FSL-1 at 1 μg/mL, HKLM at 108 cells/mL, poly I:C high (HMW) and low molecular weight (LMW) at 10 μg/mL, and LPS at 10 μg/mL, and CXCL8 secretion was measured by ELISA. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01 to control; paired Student t-test.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Calcitriol significantly suppresses CXCL8 secretion by canine sublingual epithelial cells (n = 6). The cells were stimulated with 1, 0.1, and 0.01 μM calcitriol for 24 h, and CXCL8 secretion was measured by ELISA. **p < 0.01 to control; paired Student t-test.
Figure 5
Figure 5
The TLR3 ligand poly I:C significantly decreases the viability of canine sublingual epithelial cells (n = 6). The cells were cultured for 24 h with 0.1 μM calcitriol, D. farinae extract at 20 μg/mL, Pam3CSK4 at 1 μg/mL, FSL-1 at 1 μg/mL, HKLM at 108 cells/mL, poly I:C high (HMW) and low molecular weight (LMW) at 10 μg/mL, and LPS at 10 μg/mL, and the effect on cell viability was assessed using an MTT test. ***p < 0.001 to control; paired Student t-test. Error bars: standard deviation.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Coadministration of a D. farinae extract with calcitriol suppresses CXCL8 secretion by canine sublingual epithelial cells (n = 6). The cells were cultured with 20 μg/mL D. farinae extract or a combination of 20 μg/mL D. farinae extract with 0.1 μM calcitriol for 24 h, and CXCL8 secretion was measured by ELISA. **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001 to control; paired Student t-test.

References

    1. Jutel M, Akdis CA. Immunological mechanisms of allergen-specific immunotherapy: immunological mechanisms of allergen-specific immunotherapy. Allergy. (2011) 66:725–32. 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2011.02589.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wilson DR, Torres LI, Durham SR. Sublingual immunotherapy for allergic rhinitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. (2003) CD002893 10.1002/14651858.CD002893 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Maina E, Cox E. A double blind, randomized, placebo controlled trial of the efficacy, quality of life and safety of food allergen-specific sublingual immunotherapy in client owned dogs with adverse food reactions: a small pilot study. Vet Dermatol. (2016) 27:361-e91. 10.1111/vde.12358 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Divekar R, Kita H. Recent advances in epithelium-derived cytokines (IL-33, IL-25, and thymic stromal lymphopoietin) and allergic inflammation. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. (2015) 15:98–103. 10.1097/ACI.0000000000000133 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Soumelis V, Reche PA, Kanzler H, Yuan W, Edward G, Homey B, et al. . Human epithelial cells trigger dendritic cell–mediated allergic inflammation by producing TSLP. Nat Immunol. (2002) 3:673–80. 10.1038/ni805 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms