Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Jun 4:10:891.
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00891. eCollection 2020.

The Cancer-Immune Set Point in Oesophageal Cancer

Affiliations
Review

The Cancer-Immune Set Point in Oesophageal Cancer

Robert Power et al. Front Oncol. .

Abstract

Immunotherapy has achieved long-term disease control in a proportion of cancer patients, but determinants of clinical benefit remain unclear. A greater understanding of antitumor immunity on an individual basis is needed to facilitate a precision oncology approach. A conceptual framework called the "cancer-immune set point" has been proposed to describe the equilibrium between factors that promote or suppress anticancer immunity and can serve as a basis to understand the variability in clinical response to immune checkpoint blockade. Oesophageal cancer has a high mutational burden, develops from pre-existing chronic inflammatory lesions and is therefore anticipated to be sensitive to immune checkpoint inhibition. However, both tumour- and patient-specific factors including the immune microenvironment, the microbiome, obesity, and host genetics contribute to an immune set point that confers a lower-than-expected response to checkpoint blockade. Immunotherapy is therefore currently confined to latter lines of treatment of advanced disease, with no reliable predictive biomarker of response. In this review, we examine oesophageal cancer in the context of the cancer-immune set point, discuss factors that contribute to response to immunotherapeutic intervention, and propose areas requiring further investigation to improve treatment response.

Keywords: cancer immunology; immune checkpoint inhibitors; immunotherapy; oesophageal cancer; prognostic markers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Immune checkpoints and therapeutic targets in the anti-tumour immune response. Cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA4) is a ligand expressed by T cells which prevents T cell activation and can be blocked by Ipilimumab (anti CTLA4). Activated T cells express programmed cell death protein 1 (PD1) which transmits an inhibitory signal that attenuates cytolytic activity when bound to programmed death ligand 1 (PDL1). Monoclonal antibodies that interfere with the PD1/PDL1 interaction (anti PDL1; anti PD1) allow re-invigoration of T cells.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Immunological progression in the malignant transformation to oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OAC). Reflux oesophagitis is accompanied by a TH1 pattern of inflammation which shifts to a TH2 pattern in Barrett's oesophagus. Malignant transformation is marked by a mixed TH1/TH2 pattern with tolerogenic dendritic cells (DCs), regulatory T (Treg) cells, myeloid derived suppressor cells (MDSCs).
Figure 3
Figure 3
The tumour microenvironment (TME) in oesophageal adenocarcinoma. The presence of M2-polarised tumour-associated-macrophages (TAM), regulatory T cells (Treg), and myeloid derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) restrict the action of cytotoxic CD8+ T cells (CD8 T cells), natural killer (NK) cells, and mucosa associated invariant T (MAIT) cells. Cancer associated fibroblasts (CAFs) and adipocytes derived stem cells (ADSCs) secrete extracellular matrix (ECM) and prevent migration of effector T cells to the tumour parenchyma.

References

    1. Arnold Soerjomataram M, Ferlay IJ, Forman D. Global incidence of oesophageal cancer by histological subtype in 2012. Gut. (2015) 64:381–7. 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308124 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anderson LA, Watson RGP, Murphy SJ, Johnston BT, Comber H, Mc Guigan J, et al. . risk factors for barrett's oesophagus and oesophageal adenocarcinoma: results from the FINBAR study. World J Gastroenterol. (2007) 13:1585–94. 10.3748/wjg.v13.i10.1585 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Quante Bhagat M, Abrams G, Marache JA, Good F, Lee P, et al. . Bile acid and inflammation activate gastric cardia stem cells in a mouse model of Barrett-like metaplasia. Cancer Cell. (2012) 21:36–51. 10.1016/j.ccr.2011.12.004 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Trivers KF, Sabatino SA, Stewart LS. Trends in esophageal cancer incidence by histology, United States, 1998-2003. Int J Cancer. (2008) 123:1422–8. 10.1002/ijc.23691 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Smyth EC, Lagergren J, Fitzgerald RC, Lordick F, Shah MA, Lagergren P, et al. Oesophageal cancer. Nat Rev Dis Primers. (2017) 3:17048 10.1038/nrdp.2017.48 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources