Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Jun 3:7:306.
doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00306. eCollection 2020.

Validation of Training and Acquisition of Surgical Skills in Veterinary Laparoscopic Surgery: A Review

Affiliations
Review

Validation of Training and Acquisition of Surgical Skills in Veterinary Laparoscopic Surgery: A Review

Carlos A Oviedo-Peñata et al. Front Vet Sci. .

Abstract

At present, veterinary laparoscopic surgery training is lacking in experiences that provide a controlled and safe environment where surgeons can practice specific techniques while receiving experts' feedback. Surgical skills acquired using simulators must be certified and transferable to the operating room. Most models for practicing laparoscopic skills in veterinary minimally invasive surgery are general task trainers and consist of boxes (simulators) designed for training human surgery. These simulators exhibit several limitations, including anatomic species and procedural differences, as well as general psychomotor training rather than in vivo skill recreation. In this paper, we review the existing methods of training, evaluation, and validation of technical skills in veterinary laparoscopic surgery. Content includes global and specific scales, and the conditions a structured curriculum should meet for improving the performance of novice surgeons during and after training. A focus on trainee-specific assessment and tailored-technical instruction should influence training programs. We provide a comprehensive analysis of current theories and concepts related to the evaluation and validation of simulators for training laparoscopic surgery in small animal surgery. We also highlight the need to develop new training models and complementary evaluation scales for the validation of training and acquisition of basic and advanced skills in veterinary laparoscopic surgery.

Keywords: laparoscopy; minimally invasive surgical procedures; simulation training; veterinary education; veterinary surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Benefits of hypothetical attentional resources of simulation training described by Gallagher et al. (23). Adapted from Choy and Okrainec (34).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Schematic diagram of the methods to evaluate the acquisition of surgical skills in training for minimally invasive surgery. Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS), Global operative assessment of laparoscopic skills (GOALS), Global rating scale (RGS), Specific rating scale (SRS), Operational component rating scale (OCRS), Visual analog scales (VAS).

References

    1. Matilla JR, Klepetko W, Moser B. Thymic minimally invasive surgery: state of the art across the world—Europe. J Vis Surg. (2017) 3:70. 10.21037/jovs.2017.04.01 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wong MKH, Sit AKY, Au TWK. Minimally invasive thoracic surgery: beyond surgical access. J Thorac Dis. (2018) 10:S1884–S91. 10.21037/jtd.2018.05.196 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baukloh J-K, Perez D, Reeh M, Biebl M, Izbicki JR, Pratschke J, et al. . Lower gastrointestinal surgery: robotic surgery versus laparoscopic procedures. Visc Med. (2018) 34:16–22. 10.1159/000486008 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mayhew PD. Recent advances in soft tissue minimally invasive surgery. J Small Anim Pract. (2014) 55:75–83. 10.1111/jsap.12164 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hettlich BF. Minimally invasive spine surgery in small animals. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. (2018) 48:153–68. 10.1016/j.cvsm.2017.08.008 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources