Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Mar;1(2):180022.
doi: 10.1148/ryai.2019180022. Epub 2019 Mar 27.

Automated CT and MRI Liver Segmentation and Biometry Using a Generalized Convolutional Neural Network

Affiliations
Free PMC article

Automated CT and MRI Liver Segmentation and Biometry Using a Generalized Convolutional Neural Network

Kang Wang et al. Radiol Artif Intell. 2019 Mar.
Free PMC article

Abstract

Purpose: To assess feasibility of training a convolutional neural network (CNN) to automate liver segmentation across different imaging modalities and techniques used in clinical practice and apply this to enable automation of liver biometry.

Methods: We trained a 2D U-Net CNN for liver segmentation in two stages using 330 abdominal MRI and CT exams acquired at our institution. First, we trained the neural network with non-contrast multi-echo spoiled-gradient-echo (SGPR)images with 300 MRI exams to provide multiple signal-weightings. Then, we used transfer learning to generalize the CNN with additional images from 30 contrast-enhanced MRI and CT exams.We assessed the performance of the CNN using a distinct multi-institutional data set curated from multiple sources (n = 498 subjects). Segmentation accuracy was evaluated by computing Dice scores. Utilizing these segmentations, we computed liver volume from CT and T1-weighted (T1w) MRI exams, and estimated hepatic proton- density-fat-fraction (PDFF) from multi-echo T2*w MRI exams. We compared quantitative volumetry and PDFF estimates between automated and manual segmentation using Pearson correlation and Bland-Altman statistics.

Results: Dice scores were 0.94 ± 0.06 for CT (n = 230), 0.95 ± 0.03 (n = 100) for T1w MR, and 0.92 ± 0.05 for T2*w MR (n = 169). Liver volume measured by manual and automated segmentation agreed closely for CT (95% limit-of-agreement (LoA) = [-298 mL, 180 mL]) and T1w MR (LoA = [-358 mL, 180 mL]). Hepatic PDFF measured by the two segmentations also agreed closely (LoA = [-0.62%, 0.80%]).

Conclusions: Utilizing a transfer-learning strategy, we have demonstrated the feasibility of a CNN to be generalized to perform liver segmentations across different imaging techniques and modalities. With further refinement and validation, CNNs may have broad applicability for multimodal liver volumetry and hepatic tissue characterization.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2007 Jun-Jul;31(4-5):198-211 - PubMed
    1. Radiology. 2017 Jun;283(3):711-722 - PubMed
    1. Nature. 2015 May 28;521(7553):436-44 - PubMed
    1. Magn Reson Med. 2007 Aug;58(2):354-64 - PubMed
    1. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Oct;197(4):W706-12 - PubMed