Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb;46(1):232-244.
doi: 10.1007/s10900-020-00867-z.

Systematic Review of Interventions to Increase Stool Blood Colorectal Cancer Screening in African Americans

Affiliations

Systematic Review of Interventions to Increase Stool Blood Colorectal Cancer Screening in African Americans

Siddhartha Roy et al. J Community Health. 2021 Feb.

Abstract

African Americans experience colorectal cancer (CRC) related disparities compared to other racial groups in the United States. African Americans are frequently diagnosed with CRC at a later stage, screening is underutilized, and mortality rates are highest in this group. This systematic review focused on intervention studies using stool blood CRC screening among African Americans in primary care and community settings. Given wide accessibility, low cost, and ease of dissemination of stool-based CRC screening tests, this review aims to determine effective interventions to improve participation rates. This systematic review included intervention studies published between January 1, 2000 and March 16, 2019. After reviewing an initial search of 650 studies, 11 studies were eventually included in this review. The included studies were studies conducted in community and clinical settings, using both inreach and outreach strategies to increase CRC screening. For each study, an unadjusted odds ratio (OR) for the CRC screening intervention compared to the control arm was calculated based on the data in each study to report effectiveness. The eleven studies together recruited a total of 3334 participants. The five studies using two-arm experimental designs ranged in effectiveness with ORs ranging from 1.1 to 13.0 using interventions such as mailed reminders, patient navigation, and tailored educational materials. Effective strategies to increase stool blood testing included mailed stool blood tests augmented by patient navigation, tailored educational materials, and follow-up calls or mailings to increase trust in the patient-provider relationship. More studies are needed on stool blood testing interventions to determine effectiveness in this population.

Keywords: African Americans; Cancer screening; Colonoscopy; Colorectal cancer; Stool blood tests.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA diagram of study

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. DeSantis CE, Miller KD, Goding Sauer A, Jemal A, Siegel RL. Cancer statistics for African Americans, 2019. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2019;69(3):211–233. doi: 10.3322/caac.21555. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2019. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2019;69(1):7–34. doi: 10.3322/caac.21551. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Carethers JM. Clinical and genetic factors to inform reducing colorectal cancer disparitites in African Americans. Frontiers in Oncology. 2018;8:531. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00531. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Coughlin SS, Blumenthal DS, Seay SJ, Smith SA. Toward the elimination of colorectal cancer disparities among African Americans. Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities. 2016;3(4):555–564. doi: 10.1007/s40615-015-0174-z. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. U. S. Preventive Services Task Force. Bibbins-Domingo K, Grossman DC, et al. Screening for colorectal cancer: US preventive services task force recommendation statement. JAMA. 2016;315(23):2564–2575. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.5989. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types