Multipolar mapping with the high-density grid catheter compared with conventional point-by-point mapping to guide catheter ablation for focal arrhythmias
- PMID: 32583514
- DOI: 10.1111/jce.14636
Multipolar mapping with the high-density grid catheter compared with conventional point-by-point mapping to guide catheter ablation for focal arrhythmias
Abstract
Background: Multipolar catheters provide high-density mapping which may reduce the procedural duration and improve the success of catheter ablation (CA) for focal arrhythmias. The high-density grid (HDG) catheter is a 16 electrode mapping catheter with bipole recordings at orthogonal splines. The aim of this study is to compare the clinical and procedural features from a cohort who underwent CA for focal arrhythmias using multipolar mapping (MPM) with age and case-matched cohort using point-by-point (PbyP) mapping.
Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing CA for focal arrhythmias between October 2018 and January 2020 guided by MPM were compared with PbyP mapping with the ablation catheter over a similar period. Demographics, procedural features, and outcomes were compared.
Results: A total of 54 patients (27 in MPM vs. 27 in PbyP mapping) underwent CA for 68 focal arrhythmias (26 atrial and 42 ventricular). In the MPM group, the electrogram at the successful site was significantly earlier (39 ± 11 ms) than in the PbyP group (33 ± 7 ms; p = .02). In the MPM group, the mapping time (35 ± 24 vs. 53 ± 31 min in PbyP; p = .03) and procedural duration (126 ± 42 vs. 153 ± 39 min in PbyP; p = .02) were significantly shorter. There was no significant difference in radiofrequency and fluoroscopy times, acute procedural success, and arrhythmia recurrence.
Conclusion: MPM with the HDG catheter for focal tachycardias identified earlier activation times and was associated with shorter mapping and procedure duration with equivalent success to PbyP mapping.
Keywords: HD grid; atrial tachycardia; focal; multipolar mapping; point-by-point mapping; ventricular tachycardia.
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Comment in
-
Focal arrhythmia ablation with multipolar mapping: Does it still make sense to stay off-grid?J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020 Sep;31(9):2298-2299. doi: 10.1111/jce.14634. Epub 2020 Jul 3. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020. PMID: 32583626
Similar articles
-
Impact of a high-density grid catheter on long-term outcomes for structural heart disease ventricular tachycardia ablation.J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2021 Dec;62(3):519-529. doi: 10.1007/s10840-020-00918-4. Epub 2021 Jan 4. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2021. PMID: 33392856 Free PMC article.
-
Focal arrhythmia ablation with multipolar mapping: Does it still make sense to stay off-grid?J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020 Sep;31(9):2298-2299. doi: 10.1111/jce.14634. Epub 2020 Jul 3. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020. PMID: 32583626
-
High density mapping and catheter ablation of atrial tachycardias in adults with congenital heart disease.Clin Res Cardiol. 2020 Aug;109(8):999-1007. doi: 10.1007/s00392-019-01592-x. Epub 2020 Jan 2. Clin Res Cardiol. 2020. PMID: 31897601
-
Electro-anatomic mapping systems in arrhythmias.Europace. 2008 Nov;10 Suppl 3:iii28-34. doi: 10.1093/europace/eun225. Europace. 2008. PMID: 18955396 Review.
-
Innovations in ventricular tachycardia ablation.J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2023 Sep;66(6):1499-1518. doi: 10.1007/s10840-022-01311-z. Epub 2022 Jul 25. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2023. PMID: 35879516 Review.
Cited by
-
First Report of Focal Atrial Tachycardia Originating From the Left Atrial Appendage in a 13-Year-Old Girl Treated Using the OPTRELL Multipolar Mapping Catheter.J Arrhythm. 2025 Jul 22;41(4):e70153. doi: 10.1002/joa3.70153. eCollection 2025 Aug. J Arrhythm. 2025. PMID: 40704294 Free PMC article.
-
Integration of 3D nuclear imaging in 3D mapping system for ventricular tachycardia ablation in patients with implanted devices: Perfusion/voltage retrospective assessment of scar location.Heart Rhythm O2. 2022 Jun 27;3(5):560-567. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2022.06.008. eCollection 2022 Oct. Heart Rhythm O2. 2022. PMID: 36340481 Free PMC article.
-
Nonsustained premature atrial contraction ablation guided by single-beat mapping using charge density mapping.HeartRhythm Case Rep. 2023 Feb 14;9(5):300-303. doi: 10.1016/j.hrcr.2023.02.003. eCollection 2023 May. HeartRhythm Case Rep. 2023. PMID: 37324964 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
[Focal atrial tachycardias: diagnostics and therapy].Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol. 2022 Dec;33(4):467-475. doi: 10.1007/s00399-022-00907-2. Epub 2022 Nov 7. Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol. 2022. PMID: 36342506 German.
-
Impact of a high-density grid catheter on long-term outcomes for structural heart disease ventricular tachycardia ablation.J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2021 Dec;62(3):519-529. doi: 10.1007/s10840-020-00918-4. Epub 2021 Jan 4. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2021. PMID: 33392856 Free PMC article.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Anter E, Tschabrunn C, Josephson M. High-resolution mapping of scar-related atrial arrhythmias using smaller electrodeswith closer interelectrode spacing. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2015;8(3):537-545.
-
- Kistler PM, Sanders P, Fynn SP, et al. Electrophysiological and electrocardiographic characteristics of focal atrial tachycardia originating from the pulmonary veins: acute and long-term outcomes of radiofrequency ablation. Circulation. 2003;108(16):1968-1975.
-
- Roberts-Thomson KC, Kistler PM, Haqqani HM, et al. Focal atrial tachycardias arising from the right atrial appendage: electrocardiographic and electrophysiologic characteristics and radiofrequency ablation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2007;18(4):367-372.
-
- Campbell T, Trivic I, Bennett RG, et al. Catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmia guided by a high-density grid catheter. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020;31(2):474-484.
-
- Okubo K, Frontera A, Bisceglia C, et al. Grid mapping catheter for ventricular tachycardia ablation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2019;12(9):e007500.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources