Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2020 Jun;25(24):2001057.
doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.24.2001057.

Multicentre comparison of quantitative PCR-based assays to detect SARS-CoV-2, Germany, March 2020

Maximilian Muenchhoff  1   2 , Helga Mairhofer  1   2 , Hans Nitschko  1   2 , Natascha Grzimek-Koschewa  1   2 , Dieter Hoffmann  2   3 , Annemarie Berger  2   4 , Holger Rabenau  2   4 , Marek Widera  2   4 , Nikolaus Ackermann  5 , Regina Konrad  5 , Sabine Zange  2   6 , Alexander Graf  7 , Stefan Krebs  7 , Helmut Blum  7 , Andreas Sing  5 , Bernhard Liebl  5 , Roman Wölfel  2   6 , Sandra Ciesek  2   4 , Christian Drosten  2   8 , Ulrike Protzer  2   3 , Stephan Boehm  1   2 , Oliver T Keppler  1   2
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Multicentre comparison of quantitative PCR-based assays to detect SARS-CoV-2, Germany, March 2020

Maximilian Muenchhoff et al. Euro Surveill. 2020 Jun.

Abstract

Containment strategies and clinical management of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) patients during the current pandemic depend on reliable diagnostic PCR assays for the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Here, we compare 11 different RT-PCR test systems used in seven diagnostic laboratories in Germany in March 2020. While most assays performed well, we identified detection problems in a commonly used assay that may have resulted in false-negative test results during the first weeks of the pandemic.

Keywords: COVID-19; PCR; SARS-CoV-2; diagnostic test.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Digital droplet PCR quantification of the distributed dilution series of nucleic acid eluate of SARS-CoV-2-positive clinical material, Germany, March 2020
Figure 2
Figure 2
Dilution series comparing various RT-PCR assays for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 at different laboratories, Germany, March 2020 (n =11 test systems with 34 reaction–lab combinations)
Figure 3
Figure 3
RT-PCR results of respiratory samples with low positivity, SARS-CoV-2 detection, Germany, March 2020 (n = 28 samples)
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Wu F, Zhao S, Yu B, Chen YM, Wang W, Song ZG, et al. A new coronavirus associated with human respiratory disease in China. Nature. 2020;579(7798):265-9. 10.1038/s41586-020-2008-3 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Information for laboratories about coronavirus (COVID-19). Atlanta: CDC. [Accessed: 16 April 2020]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/lab/index.html
    1. Corman VM, Landt O, Kaiser M, Molenkamp R, Meijer A, Chu DK, et al. Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR. Euro Surveill. 2020;25(3):2000045. 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.3.2000045 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization (WHO). Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) technical guidance: Laboratory testing for 2019-nCoV in humans. Geneva: WHO. [Accessed: 16 April 2020]. Available from: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/technica...
    1. van Kasteren PB, van der Veer B, van den Brink S, Wijsman L, de Jonge J, van den Brandt A, et al. Comparison of seven commercial RT-PCR diagnostic kits for COVID-19. J Clin Virol. 2020;128:104412. 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104412 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms