Swim bladder enhances lagenar sensitivity to sound pressure and higher frequencies in female plainfin midshipman (Porichthys notatus)
- PMID: 32587068
- PMCID: PMC7406320
- DOI: 10.1242/jeb.225177
Swim bladder enhances lagenar sensitivity to sound pressure and higher frequencies in female plainfin midshipman (Porichthys notatus)
Abstract
The plainfin midshipman fish (Porichthys notatus) is an established model for investigating acoustic communication because the reproductive success of this species is dependent on the production and reception of social acoustic signals. Previous work showed that female midshipman have swim bladders with rostral horn-like extensions that project close to the saccule and lagena, while nesting (type I) males lack such rostral swim bladder extensions. The relative close proximity of the swim bladder to the lagena should increase auditory sensitivity to sound pressure and higher frequencies. Here, we test the hypothesis that the swim bladder of female midshipman enhances lagenar sensitivity to sound pressure and higher frequencies. Evoked potentials were recorded from auditory hair cell receptors in the lagena in reproductive females with intact (control condition) and removed (treated condition) swim bladders while pure tone stimuli (85-1005 Hz) were presented by an underwater speaker. Females with intact swim bladders had auditory thresholds 3-6 dB lower than females without swim bladders over a range of frequencies from 85 to 405 Hz. At frequencies from 545 to 1005 Hz, only females with intact swim bladders had measurable auditory thresholds (150-153 dB re. 1 µPa). The higher percentage of evoked lagenar potentials recorded in control females at frequencies >505 Hz indicates that the swim bladder extends the bandwidth of detectable frequencies. These findings reveal that the swim bladders in female midshipman can enhance lagenar sensitivity to sound pressure and higher frequencies, which may be important for the detection of behaviorally relevant social signals.
Keywords: Acoustic signal; Auditory threshold; Communication; Hearing; Inner ear.
© 2020. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interestsThe authors declare no competing or financial interests.
Figures






Similar articles
-
Sexually dimorphic swim bladder extensions enhance the auditory sensitivity of female plainfin midshipman fish, Porichthys notatus.J Exp Biol. 2019 Jul 15;222(Pt 14):jeb204552. doi: 10.1242/jeb.204552. J Exp Biol. 2019. PMID: 31221741
-
Lagenar potentials of the vocal plainfin midshipman fish, Porichthys notatus.J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2019 Feb;205(1):163-175. doi: 10.1007/s00359-018-01314-0. Epub 2019 Jan 11. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2019. PMID: 30635725 Free PMC article.
-
Intra- and Intersexual swim bladder dimorphisms in the plainfin midshipman fish (Porichthys notatus): Implications of swim bladder proximity to the inner ear for sound pressure detection.J Morphol. 2017 Nov;278(11):1458-1468. doi: 10.1002/jmor.20724. Epub 2017 Jul 10. J Morphol. 2017. PMID: 28691340
-
Adaptive hearing in the vocal plainfin midshipman fish: getting in tune for the breeding season and implications for acoustic communication.Integr Zool. 2009 Mar;4(1):33-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4877.2008.00133.x. Integr Zool. 2009. PMID: 21392275 Review.
-
Steroid-dependent auditory plasticity for the enhancement of acoustic communication: recent insights from a vocal teleost fish.Hear Res. 2009 Jun;252(1-2):9-14. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2008.12.007. Epub 2009 Jan 6. Hear Res. 2009. PMID: 19168118 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
The mechanism for directional hearing in fish.Nature. 2024 Jul;631(8019):118-124. doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07507-9. Epub 2024 Jun 19. Nature. 2024. PMID: 38898274 Free PMC article.
-
Reproductive state modulates utricular auditory sensitivity in a vocal fish.J Neurophysiol. 2022 Nov 1;128(5):1344-1354. doi: 10.1152/jn.00315.2022. Epub 2022 Oct 26. J Neurophysiol. 2022. PMID: 36286323 Free PMC article.
-
Functional plasticity of the swim bladder as an acoustic organ for communication in a vocal fish.Proc Biol Sci. 2023 Dec 20;290(2013):20231839. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2023.1839. Epub 2023 Dec 13. Proc Biol Sci. 2023. PMID: 38087920 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Bass A. H. and Clark C. W. (2003). The physical acoustics of underwater sound communication. In Spring Handbook of Auditory Research (ed. Simmons A. M., Fay R. R. and Popper A. N.), pp. 15-64. New York: Springer.
-
- Bass A. H., Bodnar D. A. and Marchaterre M. A. (1999). Complementary explanations for existing phenotypes in an acoustic communication system. In The Design of Animal Communication (ed. Hauser M. D. and Konishi M.), pp. 493-514. Cambridge: MIT.
-
- Bradley D. and Wilson W. (1966). Acoustic Impedance of Sea Water as a Function of Temperature, Pressure and Salinity: White Oak, Silver Spring, MD: Physics Research Department, U.S. Naval Ordnance Laboratory.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous