Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jun 10:11:567.
doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00567. eCollection 2020.

The Acute Effects of External Compression With Blood Flow Restriction on Maximal Strength and Strength-Endurance Performance of the Upper Limbs

Affiliations

The Acute Effects of External Compression With Blood Flow Restriction on Maximal Strength and Strength-Endurance Performance of the Upper Limbs

Michal Wilk et al. Front Physiol. .

Abstract

The main goal of the present study was to evaluate the acute effects external compression with blood flow restriction (BFR) at 100 and 150% of full arterial occlusion pressure (AOP) on maximal strength and strength-endurance performance during the bench press (BP) exercise. The study included 12 strength-trained male subjects (age = 23.2 ± 2.66 years; body mass = 75.3 ± 6.33 kg; height = 179.1 ± 3.82 cm), experienced in resistance training (5.7 ± 2.93 years). During the experimental sessions in a randomized crossover design, the subjects performed a 1 repetition maximum (1RM) test and three sets of the BP using 60% 1RM to failure with three different conditions: without BFR (NO-BFR); BFR with a pressure of 100% AOP (BFR100); and BFR with a pressure of 150% AOP (BFR150). The differences between the NO-BFR, BFR100, and BFR150 conditions were examined using repeated measures ANOVA. The ANOVA indicated significant main effect for condition in 1RM, number of performed repetitions (REP), and time under tension (TUT) (p < 0.01). Post hoc analyses for the main effect indicated significant increases in 1RM (p < 0.01; 95.00 ± 15.37 vs 91.87 ± 15.99), REP (p < 0.01; 17.56 ± 3.36 vs 15.67 ± 5.24), and TUT (p < 0.01; 32.89 ± 6.40 vs 28.72 ± 6.18) for the BFR150 condition compared to NO-BFR. Furthermore, significant increases in REP (p = 0.03; 17.56 ± 3.36 vs 16.47 ± 4.01) and TUT (p = 0.03; 32.89 ± 6.40 vs 30.00 ± 6.45) were observed for the BFR150 condition compared to the BFR100. The results of the present study indicate that high external compression increases maximal strength evaluated by the 1RM test, as well as endurance performance during three sets of the BP exercise.

Keywords: 1RM test; bench press; occlusion; pressure; repetitions; time under tension.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Individual responses for the IRM test between conditions.

References

    1. Bogdanis G. C., Nevill M. E., Lakomy H. K. A., Boobis L. H. (1998). Power output and muscle metabolism during and following recovery from 10 and 20 s of maximal sprint exercise in humans. Acta Physiol. Scand. 163 261–272. 10.1046/j.1365-201x.1998.00378.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cohen J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd Edn Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.
    1. Cook C. J., Kilduff L. P., Beaven C. M. (2014). Improving strength and power in trained athletes with 3 weeks of occlusion training. Int. J. Sports Physiol. Perform. 9 166–172. 10.1123/ijspp.2013-0018 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Doan B. K., Kwon Y. H., Newton R. U., Shim J., Popper E. M., Rogers R. A., et al. (2003). Evaluation of a lower-body compression garment. J Sports Sci. 21 601–610. - PubMed
    1. Ellefsen S., Hammarström D., Strand T. A., Zacharoff E., Whist J. E., Rauk I., et al. (2015). Blood flow restricted strength training displays high functional and biological efficacy in women: a within-subject comparison with high-load strength training. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 309 767–779. 10.1152/ajpregu.00497.2014 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources