Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jun 10:11:1303.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01303. eCollection 2020.

Socioeconomic Status and Psychological Well-Being: Revisiting the Role of Subjective Socioeconomic Status

Ginés Navarro-Carrillo  1 , María Alonso-Ferres  2 , Miguel Moya  2 , Inmaculada Valor-Segura  2
Affiliations

Socioeconomic Status and Psychological Well-Being: Revisiting the Role of Subjective Socioeconomic Status

Ginés Navarro-Carrillo et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Socioeconomic status (SES) is a complex and multidimensional construct, encompassing both independent objective characteristics (e.g., income or education) and subjective people's ratings of their placement in the socioeconomic spectrum. Within the growing literature on subjective SES belongingness and psychological well-being, subjective indices of SES have tended to center on the use of pictorial rank-related social ladders where individuals place themselves relative to others by simultaneously considering their income, educational level, and occupation. This approach, albeit consistent with the idea of these social ladders as summative or cognitive SES markers, might potentially constrain individuals' conceptions of their SES. This research (N = 368; M age = 39.67, SD = 13.40) is intended to expand prior investigations on SES and psychological well-being by revisiting the role of subjective SES. In particular, it (a) proposes an innovative adaptation of the traditional MacArthur Scale of subjective SES to income, education, and occupation, thus resulting in three separate social ladders; and (b) tests the empirical contribution of such three social ladders to psychological well-being. Overall, our findings showed that the novel education and occupation ladders (excluding the income ladder) are predictive of a significant part of the variance levels of psychological well-being that is not due to canonical objective metrics of SES (i.e., income, education, and occupation), or to the conventional MacArthur Scale of subjective SES. Although preliminary, these results underscore the need to further reconsider (subjective) SES-related conceptualization and measurement strategies to gather a more comprehensive understanding of the SES-psychological well-being link.

Keywords: objective socioeconomic status; psychological well-being; social class; socioeconomic status; subjective socioeconomic status.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Frequency distribution of each subjective SES indicator.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Visual comparison of standardized beta coefficients of the various objective and subjective SES measures.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Adler N. E., Epel E. S., Castellazzo G., Ickovics J. R. (2000). Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: preliminary data in healthy, White women. Health Psychol. 19 586–592. 10.1037/0278-6133.19.6.586 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Akinwande M. O., Dikko H. G., Samson A. (2015). Variance inflation factor: as a condition for the inclusion of suppressor variable(s) in regression analysis. Open J. Stat. 5 754–767. 10.4236/ojs.2015.57075 - DOI
    1. American Psychological Association (2007). Report of the APA Task Force On Socioeconomic Status. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
    1. Baker E. H. (2014). “Socioeconomic status, definition,” in The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Health, Illness, Behavior, And Society, eds Cockerham W. C., Dingwall R., Quah S. R. (Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell; ), 2210–2214. 10.1002/9781118410868.wbehibs395 - DOI
    1. Baumann S., Szabo M., Johnston J. (2019). Understanding the food preferences of people of low socioeconomic status. J. Consum. Cult. 19 316–339. 10.1177/1469540517717780 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources